Evolution, Genes, Psychology And History

Evolution, Genes, Psychology and History.

 

By

 

R.E. Prindle

 

I.

 

One of the thorniest problems for science and religion has been the fact of Evolution. Darwin enunciated the process in 1859 and stated some of the central problems.

Since 1859 a great deal of progress has been attained in all relevant fields of knowledge. Two facts have emerged clearly within the last decade. One is the fact that the HS III brain continues to evolve toward a greater potential for intelligence and that the African is the least intelligent of the human species.

Just as Darwin’s announcement of Evolution devastated a number of preconceived notions of the relations of God to man and beast so the two latest developments give the coup de grace to those preconceived notions.

To quote William Saletan of Slate

http://.slate.com/toolbar.aspx?action=print&id=2178122

Quote:

(Evolution) is a threat to their whole value system. As William Jennings Bryan put it during the Scopes trial, evolution meant elevating “supposedly superior intellect,” “eliminating the weak,” “paralyzing hope of reform,” jeopardizing the doctrine of brotherhood,” and undermining “the sympathetic activities of a civilized society.”

Bryan was right on the challenges to the Liberal ideology but wrong on the results. He underestimated the resourcefulness of Liberal ideologues.

Since Darwin and Bryan Liberals have been fighting the mounting evidence that indicates the evolution of the brain toward greater intelligence and the inherent lack of capacity of the African. Liberals have caused untold suffering to intelligent men and women who contradicted their ideology even though as it now evolves they were right and the Liberals wrong.

Earlier this month (Nov. ’07) the Liberals threw in the sponge on the African question. Scientific genetic discoveries proved insurmountable even to their bigotry. They had to choose between becoming stultified or capitulating. They chose to capitulate but they needed a scapegoat.

I have no proof but it seems probable that James Watson, as co-discoverer of DNA, volunteered for that role. At 90 he had nothing to lose so he became the messenger to deliver the inescapable truth. Oh yeah, he apologized for telling the truth while either being fired from a largely honorary job or resigning to humiliate himself so that the Liberals would have a sacrifice that somehow justified the abdication of their position.

Their ideology has not changed but will require a slight shift in tactics.

Mr. Saletan in his essay that appeared a couple weeks after Mr. Watson’s announcement of the scientific facts gives some indication of the nature of the shift of emphasis in tactics. No longer having any hope of ’raising’ the African by education Mr. Saletan gives the thrust of the new direction.

Quote:

Intermarriage is closing the gap. To the extent that the differences (he prefers human testing to scientific facts) are genetic the surest way to eliminate them is to reunite (?) the human genome. (That’s what he said, reverse evolution.) This is already happening, including in my own family. In 1970 1 percent of U.S. marriages were between blacks and non-blacks. By 1990 it was 4.5 percent. It may be the best punch line of the IQ debate: The more genetic the racial gap is, the faster we can eliminate it

Unquote.

Thus Mr. Saletan’s solution, as spokesperson for the Liberals, is to negate evolution and dumb down the human race.

While I disparage any reliance on IQ testing which as a human device is much less reliable than the evidence of nature which has been recognized by the intelligent minority for centuries, Mr. Saletan and others do. By their understanding of IQ scores Africans are the lowest at 85, ’Whites’ next lowest at 100, Mongolids nearly atop the ladder at 106 but then Mr. Saletan does a remarkable thing, he shifts the emphasis from species or what he calls ’races’ to an individual religious group. He gives ’the Jews’ a top score of 113. Thus showing his scientific acumen he mixes apples and oranges always assuming the test scores aren’t rigged whether intentionally or unintentionally. Semites should have been substituted for ’the Jews’ and the rigging will become apparent immediately.

Thus no matter who the Africans intermarry with the result will be a lessening of the world’s intelligence or IQ.

This isn’t really the issue. The issue is the genocide of ’Whiteness.’ There can be no doubt this is the intent of the intermarriage that Mr. Saletan mentions.

As you may be aware a Harvard graduate and sometime Harvard professor, Mr. Noel Ignatiev (Jewish) has called for the elimination of Whites by ’any means necessary.’ Recently a retired Black CNN newscaster ( I apologize for not knowing his name but I never watch CNN) announced that the half billion White men in the world had better be alert because they are surrounded by a sea of colored. Thus as with Ignatiev, who also by the way has the entrée of UC Berkeley and other prestigious universities, the threat is the genocide of the Euroamerican male.

The women can be kept because women are, well, desirable, besides which once impregnated the child will be colored and Whiteness will disappear.

So the shift in Liberal emphasis will merely mean the further indoctrination and conditioning of Euroamerican women to accept Black men. Thus in the next few months we should see a veritable blitz of movies and TV shows depicting Euroamerican women chasing or throwing themselves at African men.

I don’t like to think it but Evolution in all probability will be negated and that shortly.

Part II

 

Since the decoding of the genome the emphasis has been on genes. The search is on for a gene that causes this and that. On the one hand the concentration on genes overlooks the chromosomes and their relationship to each other as well as the DNA double helix to the whole while on the other hand the whole concept of Evolution is being ignored. The differences between the human species lies not so much in the genes, although they are the obvious agents of evolution and differentiation. The key is that the species are in the process of differentiation.

Evolution at this point seems to be occurring in the brain. A change toward greater intelligence.

The African’s intelligence while limited by genes is limited because as the first Homo Sapiens, which everyone agrees, these genes had not yet evolved. As the difference between the Last Hominid Predecessor and presumably the African as the first Homo Sapiens was not that large the African then must simply be the first step in the Evolution of the genus Homo Sapiens.

The current feeling seems to be that if a certain quality is needed the human body will produce a gene for it. Thus Liberals believe that the African is Black because Blackness was needed as a protection from the tropical sun. This ignores the fact that gorillas are not only Black but have a heavy coat of hair which is even better protection from that devilish tropical sun. So the question would seem to be why the African either lost his coat of hair or failed to develop one which would have been even more advantageous than being merely black. Obviously the African would be in much better shape with a protective coat of hair. Thus Evolution instead of working to his advantage has actually worked against it.

What is more likely is that the African is Black for genetic reasons and genetic reasons alone. His color has nothing to do with the tropical sun.

In the Liberal collection of Just So stories then they say that Whites , who they believe are nothing but displaced Africans, developed a gene for Whiteness in response to Europe’s cold pale sun. This doesn’t explain why White people at the same time didn’t develop a fur coat that shed in the summer and increased for protection from the cold in winter, perhaps becoming protectively white to camouflage them in the snow. Nor do they deign to advise us how long it takes for the genes to recognize the need for Whiteness and begin adaptation.

Thus we are told that Homo Sapiens first evolved in Africa c. 150,000-200,000 years ago and he was Black. While the other human species evolved from these first Black Homo Sapiens the they give us no hint as to when this happened. With absolutely no evidence to support their thesis they hypothesize that Africans as Black people migrated from Africa c. 100,000 to 50,000 years ago. One assumes that the process of genetic adaptation proceeded at a very rapid rate being accomplished within a few thousand years or so.

The problem with Europeans changing their spots in adaptation to the weather is that Europe was buried under hundreds of feet of ice during the last Ice Age. Northern Europe might not have been habitable and then only the Southern parts until 30,000 years ago. So as of 30K years ago the Black African emigrants could not have begun their genetic change to White.

Further the current occupants of Europe weren’t even in Europe until very recent historical times. The Celts who came from the steppes of Asia entered Europe c.1000 B.C. the Goths followed on their heels. The first Mongolids to enter Europe were the Huns c. 500 B.C. Thus White Europeans developed on the steppes, or migrated there, of Asia where the European climate couldn’t have affected their genetic makeup and yet they were White while they were living cheek by jowl with dark toned Mongolids. For some reason the Mongolids who must have been out on the steppes as long as the Whites didn’t develop a climatic White gene. Why not?

Further still, the most recent settlers of the Americas are said to be Asian immigrants. Yet according to Mr. Saletan the Asians register spectacular I.Q.s ranging over 110 while their American descendents register only 89 or so. Did the I. Q.s of the Asian immigrants sink for some weather related reason or have the East Asians artificially raised theirs by contact with a superior stock and manipulation of tests or test results? How do the Liberals intend to explain such disparities? They don’t. Obviously they just sweep them under the rug then pass laws to make questioning their conclusions illegal.

They refuse to consider the obvious explanation and that is Evolution.

Evolution occurs in small increments. As the first Homo Sapiens to evolve, the African is a rather primitive model. What is obvious is that Whites, Asians and Semites are all more highly evolved models. As late as the end of the nineteenth century Africans had progressed no further than a stone age life style. This is not their fault of course but it is nevertheless true. After having been in contact with a higher civilization for several hundred years Africa is slipping back into a stone age existence as evidenced by Zimbabwe and South Africa and any number of former colonies of Europe.

One can’t expect more as Nature cannot evolve higher models without leaving less evolved models behind. This is so obvious it isn’t even worth mentioning but one must. This is just a fact; you can live with it or grouse.

The question then is are the other Homo Sapiens species at the same stage of Evolution?

It doesn’t seem possible.

First let me state that I think it probable that there are two possibly three species of Whites in existence. The first evolved from the African while the succeeding two are genetic improvements on the first White species. The first White species as it evolved from the African undoubtedly was originally White because of the genetic mutation.

As Evolution is continuing it can only be doing so in the second or third White species. Just as the African has realized his full potential so have the first and second White species assuming that a third is in existence. As nature seems to move in sixes and sevens it follows that a fourth, fifth and sixth and a possible seventh remain to evolve before evolution comes to fruition.

That means that the Semites and Mongolids are sterile species who have also realized their full potential. That there may be dead end species of Homo Sapiens should surprise no one. After all Neanderthal man among others was an evolutionary dead end.

I put little faith in I.Q. tests that are human contrivances and as such will be made to produce results that gratify human expectations.

If one looks at the results of human development at the present time all of the other species are living according to the results of While intellectual development. All societies on earth today are organized along White lines with the possible exception of the primitive African.

They are keenly aware of this and find it acutely embarrassing hence the Get Whitey scenario announced by the Semite Noel Ignatiev of Harvard University.

In conjunction with this intellectual and emotional problem a second and even more important one has evolved as was predicted by Charles Darwin and with predictable results.

Part III.

 

If you can accommodate your mind to the notion that Evolution has created a hierarchy of Human Species it is not necessary that you accept my understanding of the hierarchy. I’m sure the notion of two or three different White species is a difficult one as all Whites look alike, but, Francis Galton was not a complete fool. It is enough that the reader reject the Biblical fallacy that ‘God’ created all mankind on the seventh day.

But if you can accept the notion of several human species then there are natural consequences to the idea that are currently in progess. A passage from Darwin’s 1859 Origin Of Species explains this process.

Quote:

As species of the same genus have usually, though by no means invariably, some similarities in habits and constitution, and always in structure, the struggle will generally be more severe between species of the same genus, when they come into competition with each other, than between species of distinct genera. We see this in the recent extension in parts of the United States of one species of swallow having caused the decrease of another species. The recent increase of the missal-thrush in parts of Scotland has caused the decrease of the song thrush. How frequently we hear of one species of rat taking the place of another species under the most different climates! In Russia the small Asiatic cockroach has everywhere driven before it its great congener. One species of charlock will supplant another and so in other cases. We can dimly see why the competition should be most severe between allied forms, which fill nearly the same place in the economy of nature; but probably in no one case could we precisely say why one species has been victorious over another in the battle of life.

Unquote.

Nature does not make exceptions to its general rules. What is true with birds, rats, cockroaches and any other genus is true of the genus Homo Sapiens.

An example of one human species causing the decrease of another and displacing it is the European invasion of America in which a program of extermination of the native Asiatics was commenced but not completed. The remainder were collected and placed in circumscribed areas. The European species took possession of the land.

This was a natural result of the competition of species within a genus filling the same economic niche. The extinction of numerous animal species is the result of the same process. When grazing land is needed for species preferred by Homo Sapiens all other ruminants are destroyed or driven from the land.

When one realizes the natural process then the understanding of current natural migrations becomes understandable.

The Asiatic migrations into the same North America in which Europeans formerly displaced Asiatics is now occurring in reverse. Asiatics from Mexico and points South and Asiatics from China are now displacing Europeans. Mexicans are attempting to displace Europeans from California and other places while San Francisco is today one third Asiatics from China. Within a matter of years both Mexicans and Chinese will have displaced Europeans while the conflict will then take place between Mexicans and Chinese. The Chinese will undoubtedly displace their fellow Asiatic Mexicans.

Unlike the Asiatics displaced by the European who put up a stiff resistance, the current European population is putting up no resistance to either the Mexican or Chinese invasions. In fact they are doing everything they can to facilitate the invasions, including holding the door open for them. An almost unprecedented situation.

The same is true in the European homeland where major invasions of Semites, Africans and Asiatics are occurring with no resistance but full complicity.

That Darwinian principles are involved is evident from the stated intent of Semites, Africans and Asiatics to exterminate the indigenous population of Euroamericans.

Thus the colored populations of the world have temporarily united to sweep what they call ‘Whiteness’ off the face of the earth.

The process is so far along while resistance is not only feeble but non-existent that the result is virtually certain if not a virtual actuality.

Once the Euroamericans are exterminated it seems reasonably certain that the Chinese who are currently in the process of occupying Africa will exterminate the most primitive of Homo Sapiens species. From that point on it is anybody’s guess.

Part IV.

 

If you can accept the concept of Evolution and the progression of the species as well as the inevitable conflict of the species when they come in contact we can briefly examine the nature and progress of those contacts.

It follows that as the first evolved Homo Sapiens species the African realized their full potential rather quickly entering into a relatively stable stone age life style that remained unchanged until they came into contact with Semites and Europeans.

Although Africans had contact with Europeans in the persons of Ancient Greeks and sustained contacts with the Roman Empire they seemed to have learned little from them.

The Semites with whom the Africans had sustained contact from at least 700 AD who merely extracted Africans as slaves or assimilated themselves changing color while retaining Arab culture. The Semites themselves had realized their own fulfillment at least by the beginning of the nineteenth century.

The fulfilled Semitic culture is represented by the Middle East c. 1800. Whatever technological developments the Semites employed were purchased or taken from the West. As the Ugandan chief Mtese was to say, he noticed that all the goods the Arabs brought to trade were manufactured in Europe.

C. 1500 when Europe began its invasion of the world then, Africans and Semites had realized their full potential as human species as had the Mongolids of East Asia and the Indians of the subcontinent. All were stagnant societies that would have remained unchanged forever without the introduction of the European yeast.

As I stated before the main stem of active evolution progresses from Africans who may be styled H.S I for Homo Sapiens One to the Whites who did not begin in Europe. HS II which must have evolved from HS I during the last Ice Age and undoubtedly settled in the exposed Mediterranean Valley. They apparently developed the first civilization. When the ice melted and the waters rose they were flushed out of the Med Valley around its shores thus civilization as we date it began.

In so far as HS II occupied Spain , Crete, Greece and Italy these must have been the first Europeans. In all probability HS II has also realized its full potential but even so is more highly evolved than Africans. Semites and Mongolids.

Here comes the part that’s going to stick in your craw. In the steppes of Asia the second ‘European’ or Aryan people began to realize its destiny. The Aryans either migrated from or were driven out of Asia by the Mongolids. Over the centuries they settled in India, the Middle East and the northern latitudes of Europe. They were the last to begin to realize their potential. That potential may now be fully realized while HS IV s either have evolved in small numbers or ready to be evolved.

So, as of c. 1500 all species of Homo Sapiens seemed to be at the same level of development. It would have taken a sharp eye to notice the differences although as Tennyson was to say: Better fifty years of Europe than a cycle of Cathay.

From c. 1500 to 1900 the Europeans went through an amazing stage of development rapidly developing technology in unheard of directions while beginning scientific researches that have now decoded the genetic structure of not only the human but various other genomes.

This knowledge was gained as Europe successfully but briefly obtained hegemony of the world.

Now, I am not going to appeal to anything so questionable as I.Q. tests but the actual results of the societies and civilizations the various human species have organized.

Thus when Europeans began their invasion of the world c. 1500 all societies were more or less equally evolved, but only the Europeans had not realized the full potential of their Homo Sapiens species. While the other species remained static the Europeans rapidly surpassed them.

By 1800 Europeans were clearly superior on the basis of their accomplishments while by 1900 they had lapped the field. However in their intellectual development they became more far seeing, sensitive to the effect they were having on the other species, while having what all other species lacked as a result, a conscience.

As conquerors the Western invasion was a new departure from that of all previous conquerors. The West brought benefits to the conquered peoples rather than just subjugating and looting them.

Rather than going into Africa and stamping the Africans flat they tried to do the impossible or elevate them beyond the limits of the species. For one hundred fifty thousand years the Africans had been exterminating each other in the literal sense of the term or driving the defeated tribes onto the least desirable land where the defeated either perished or were vastly reduced in numbers thus posing no further threat.

This is what the Europeans should have done to the Africans rather than encourage them. Instead today Euroamericans are on the brink of being exterminated by the Africans in their turn. The Africans have merely returned to their ancestral stone age ways except with machine guns that since they haven’t the knowhow to manufacture are supplied by the Whites of the West for the extermination of their own people. I ask you, what does a high I.Q. mean?

One fatal mistake Euroamericans made was to share hygienic and medical advances with the other species. Thus instead of natural means such as famine and disease controlling their populations the populations of all these peoples skyrocketed.

The Chinese went from 300 million to a billion and a half, the Indians from 250 million to one billion plus while the Africans shot up from 150 million to well over a billion. During that same time Euroamericans increased only marginally dropping from a 20% share of world population to less than 10%.

When the conquered peoples taught and armed by the Europeans, instructed in modern civilization by them, began to assert themselves the Europeans retreated back into their original territories thus sealing their doom. The only Euroamerican choice once the invasion of the world had begun was conquer or die.

Having now lost the will to win which was quickly apprehended by the formerly conquered people they in their turn began to invade Europe and America where they have met no or at best, feeble resistance. Indeed Euroamericans seem to welcome and encourage their own conquest and extermination. They pass laws making it a crime for their own people to resist.

Whether this is unprecedented is difficult to say. Certainly the Sumerians allowed themselves to be infiltrated and submerged by the surrounding Semites. Possibly the Aryan Indic civilization did the same in their area. Indeed, such a lack of sustained effort may be a shortcoming of the Aryan peoples. If so they are only getting what they’ve got coming to them.

Less intellectually developed than the Indo Europeans lacking a conscience the other species have already planned and are in process of exterminating the Euroamericans. I refer you once again to the plan put into execution under the name of Noel Ignatiev.

V.

 

If one looks at how ancient patterns are being followed today I hope I will not shock by my following comments. In Africa today when Robert Mugabe was installed in Zimbabwe because of Euroamerican pressures on the former White government as a Shona chief he immediately began the extermination of the Matabele Zulu in vengeance for the century earlier warfare on the Shona by the Matabele while at the same time dispossessing and driving out the Whites.

In America encouraged by the lack of White resistance Blacks are now openly attacking lone Whites in vengeance for their enslavement of a hundred years ago. With laws preventing Whites to defend themselves it is only a matter of time until random attacks cease and organized murderous attacks begin.

Semites in America with Noel Ignatiev as their spokesperson openly call for the extermination of a billion Whites by any means necessary. These are shocking happenings both in Africa and Euroamerica in what are supposedly enlightened times. But enlightenment is only enjoyed by Euroamericans which Moslem and African activities around the world show.

So in reality Europeans should have acted toward Africans in the time honored tradition of either exterminating them or driving them into the deserts and wastelands to survive or perish as they would.

As in the Darwinian sense when two species of the same economic niche have come into conflict one must, I repeat must, eliminate the other. Thus Whites have willingly surrendered the supremacy and are now being murdered or driven from the land.

The Africans are foolishly inviting the Chinese into the continent. The Chinese like the Africans have no conscience and will have no compunction in either exterminating the Africans or driving them into waste spaces just as the Africans drove the Gorillas and Apes into the least desirable areas.

Gnash your teeth and lament it if you like but nature will out.

Thus Europeans missed their opportunity. They foolishly permitted, even encouraged, the population of the entire planet to explode.

As the colored population spiraled out of control Euroamericans became an ever diminishing percent of humanity. While with decreasing numbers they foolishly squandered their technological superiority.

In addition the colored populations were enraged by the evident superiority of the Whites. Nothing hurts worse than being treated like little children by superior acting people. The Africans, Semites and Mongolids then began the invasion of Euroamerica with the full intent of eliminating the people. As of old they will kill the men and keep the women.

Now, this invasion would have been difficult to impossible without a Fifth Column inside the two continents. The colored auxiliaries and allies are the Liberals of the West. The West was enervated by the propaganda of a population so miniscule as to defy credibility. They were a splinter group of the Semites.

The West must be thought of as encompassing Europe and West Asia otherwise known as the Middle East including the Arabian peninsula. At the beginning of history a conflict arose between the two species occupying the Eastern Mediterranean. The Semites on the one hand and the Europeans or Aryans on the other.

Over time the Turks would occupy Anatolia or Turkey and the Aryans Persia or Iran. Both groups were Semitized and thus stultified into ineffectiveness while subordinated to the Semites.

The nature of the conflict would be explained by the Greek historian Herodotus but his explication has never been taken seriously. His story was explained as an age old conflict between ‘Asia’ and ‘Europe.’ Those terms mask the conflict between what was really Semites and Aryans. In the conflict the Aryans were usually military victors. Even Cadmus who established a Semitic foothold in Europe in Boeotia was beaten down and driven out. The Romans eliminated the Semitic Carthaginians from the West Mediterranean. Alexander appeared to crush the Semites.

But the Jews came into existence after their deportation to Babylon and the Jews created a Trojan Horse to defang the superior Aryans. Paul of Tarsus used the Jewish sect of Christians to inject an enervating religious creed into the Europeans.

Unable to defeat Europeans in the field Christianity taught Europeans to turn the other cheek. While ‘brotherhood’ was abjured by Mongolids, Semites and Africans Europeans were taught to think first of others before themselves. More specifically they were taught to put the interests of the Jews as ‘little brothers’ before their own.

Thus the Bible was pushed as the Holy Book of Europeans. Over the centuries the Bible took hold most especially in South Europe that was in direct contact with the Semites. While the Bible was militarily inflicted on the North Europeans, as a separate species from the South, they resented the imposition ultimately throwing off the yoke.

Liberalism probably arose from that split. By the end of the French Revolution Liberalism had come into being. Thus the apparent willingness of today’s Liberals to subordinate their manhood to all other peoples probably arose from this history.

As religionists they adopted the Holier than Thou attitude characteristic of them. The Europeans who cast off the Biblical or Jewish yoke became second class citizens as did those Whites in the United States who were not of the Judaeo-Puritan persuasion.

In both Europe and the United States Liberals took up the cause of the colored majority functioning as a colored Fifth Column. They constantly hamstrung and sabotaged all efforts to hold the place that had been won in the world. Liberals have always been pro-African, pro-Semite and pro-Mongolid. Historically they cheer every European defeat and deplore every European victory.

Liberals have invited the colored peoples of the world and the Moslems who one and all resent their former subjugation to Europeans and consequently hate White people. Liberals have even made a gift of the West’s economies to the Chinese. There can be nothing more false than that the Chinese have the highest I.Q. in the world. Historical evidence is against any such notion. Euroamericans have simply set them up in business.

Now, as Darwin pointed out the competition between species is always the most vicious as, indeed, are civil wars. The economy we have enjoyed for the last hundred years or so has been based on abundant resources. Those resources are not unlimited but are actually exhausted. Without abundance of resources not only cannot the world economy be supported but not even one national economy such as China or the United States can be supported. The critical areas at present of course are oil and water.

As the Liberal credo has always been that no one can be prosperous if all are not prosperous they have naturally transferred the prosperity of the West to the East. There’s nothing that can be done with the Africans. Thus with oil supplies declining rapidly while oil use in the East is increasing dramatically not only will there not be enough to go around but because of the Jewish direction of North America’s foreign affairs such deep resentments have been created at all levels of the Middle East that all of those supplies will go East.

The West impoverished by the East and invaded or emasculated by immigrants however you choose from every direction will thus be eliminated from the face of the earth.

There is absolutely no informed person who cannot see this. Conservatives lament but meekly consent although some few do complain. The Liberals on the other hand applaud and forward the result because of Biblical indoctrination and conditioning of one world, people, one hell hole.

The question is then will it come to pass or is rejection possible?

VI.

 

No one can positively say what will happen or how soon but there are factors militating against the realization of Liberal desires. It should be clear by now that Liberals are the prime enemy. They must be disabled first. Anyone not willing to take up that fight should quietly submit and stop irritating us with complaints.

Along with tight resources the burgeoning global population now approaching seven billion is already too much for the planet to sustain. Malthusian limits have already been reached and passed. Water and oil are the keys. The level of the Great Lakes in North America are already receding steadily from over consumption. A conspiracy to bring Africa and Asia to North America is adding millions of new water consumers per year. One can drain the Great Lakes, for instance, only once. After that the well has run dry.

With another million people or so added in Georgia’s current drought and that State would be dry in more ways than one. The same is true all over the world. Everyone, I repeat, everyone already knows this but they still persist in what can only be considered an insane enterprise.

Further Liberals know that it is an insane enterprise because they pass laws forbidding anyone to say it is an insane enterprise.

At any rate it is very probable that population pressures on resources will disrupt all plans in progress. When that happens the very hostile populations within regions will begin wars of extermination on each other so that the pressures on Euroamericans will be disrupted and distributed over a wide area. Blacks and Whites will not only be at war but Blacks vs. Mexicans, Mexicans vs. Chinese and all against each other. This may happen within ten years or so. It is best then to be prepared. These will be wars of extermination. Ruthless. One must be mentally prepared to kill.

In all probability regions will find it difficult to impossible to invade other regions so all the warfare will probably be intra-regional.

As the colored peoples have already gotten their Liberal handlers to pass laws forbidding Whites to combine those laws will have to be disregarded. It would be best to organize now and repeal them but that seems scarcely likely. So far Conservatives just talk.

So if Evolution is to be allowed to run its course the gene pool of HS III and possibly IV must be kept intact. A viable psychological approach must be devised and propagated. Psychological training is a first priority. That means a rejection of the Biblical ethos. The way is clear. This is no longer a nation of two approaches but a region of several potential warring populations. The first enemy is the Liberal faction. While nothing can be obtained by palavers it is still best to keep up the appearance of a dialogue but know that nothing can come of it so that military preparations continue. Organize.