Part V Deconstruction Of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ America

May 24, 2007

The Deconstruction Of

Edgar Rice Burroughs’

America

by

R.E. Prindle

Part V

 The Byss And The Abyss

You could kiss your lips, and have all the fun

to yourself,

If you only knew the trick.

It would be perfectly easy

If they would only stay there

Until you got around to them.

Why don’t you manage it somehow?

Benjamin Paul Blood:

Quoted by William James

The Varieties Of Religious Experience

     In 1914-15 the great modern Jewish cultural adventure was beginning.  The culture was prepared.  As they say of a good football team, it makes its own breaks.  It was a matter of waiting patiently for opportunity then taking advantage of it.  In 1917 the Big Break came when the German General Ludendorff transported Lenin and his cadre of Jewish Revolutionaries to the Finland Station in St. Petersburg.  In October Trotsky drove the nail home.  The Jews had been prepared.  They had been working out the details for a couple decades or more.  At least since Freud joined with his like minded fellows of B’nai B’rith in 1895.

     Little details pop up in his writing.  In his 1914 On the History Of The Psychoanalytic Movement he lets drop a line that the progress of the French Revolution had been charted and understood.  A few years later the Jewish Revolutionaries in Petersburg would be running around with this little volume of analysis in their back pockets.  Freud refers to the revolution, Thermidors, epigones and reaction.  Psychologically events have to follow in a certain order.  they will follow in that order so if you are aware of things to come in their proper order you will be in a position to anticpate and manipulate.  What the French Revolution had to do with the history of the Psychoanalytic movement isn’t made clear.

     My feeling is that the study of the French Revolution was the role of the men of B’nai B’rith to which Freud was privy.  His role as a psychoanalyst would be to prepare the minds of the revolutionaries for the slaughtering to come while he probably also assisted in the damage control applications for the inevitable reaction when the Europeans had realized what the Jews had done.  Remember in a multicultural environment each culture maintains its identity so that it is necessary to speak of a distinct Jewish and European cultures.  The cultures will of necessity be antagonistic contrary to the ill informed Liberal projection of universal brotherhood.

     Thus in 1917, four years into the Jewish Revolution the culture enjoyed a signal success in Russia; implementing the plan then became the problem.  While the culture might well have expected a rapid worldwide success as all allied governments, including the US, were heavily infiltrated with fellow culturalists.  However the Jews were baffled by the successes of Hitler and Stalin

     While things seemed to be going according to plan in Russia the premature death of Lenin was not accounted for nor the success of Stalin.  You can understand the rage of Trotsky in exile in the swamps of Asia against the triumph of what he considered the epigone, Josef Stalin.  The Man of Steel was a National Socialist who aborted the international revolution pursued by Trotsky and his culture.  This was no small thing for the Jewish Revolution.

Herr Doktor Professor Sigmund Freud

    In the West as Freud had predicted a firestorm of protest against the Jewish culture took place.  Behind the phalanx of Liberals who took their side the culture had two main lines of defense.  One was simply to deny everything much as they accuse the so-called Holocaust deniers of today and the second was to denounce accusers as madmen, conspiracy theorists, cranks and anti-Semites.  As they pretty effectively controlled the media, which they denied, these courses were easy for them.

     As an historian this stuff is my meat.  I like it.  It was at that time that a little book appeared entitled The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion.  This volume is the center of the firestorm.  Naturally the culture denied any involvement with the book calling it a forgery by which they meant someone other than themselves had written it and palmed it off on them.

     Over the next twenty years or so it was claimed that their authorship was ‘proven’ false.  This is not true.  The authorship is still an open question, nothing has been proven either way.  As the book was reproduced by Henry Ford in his Dearborn Independent articles and we know Burroughs read the articles let us deal with that issue first.

————————————

     While the Protocols are claimed to be a forgery it is also universally assented that they are pased on an 1864 predecessor by the French Jew Maurice Joly entitled Dialogues Between Machiavelli and Montesquiou in Hell.  Clearly so.  Both works are now readily available if you’re interested in this sort of thing.

     It is claimed that Joly was a Jew while being denied, naturally, by the culture.  Joly was at the least of Jewish descent, which is to say the son of Jews,  while I have seen his picture and he looks Jewish to me.  But perhaps he was a secular and not religious Jew whatever than distinction might mean.

     It is said the Dialogues applied to Napoleon III then reigning in France but then it is said the Testament Of Dr. Mabuse parodies the Nazis.  I don’t think either is true.  How many times can you pull the same trick before someone, anyone catches on?

     At any rate it is said that Napoleon III got wind of publication of the book that it so alarmed and inflamed him that he confiscated the entire printing at the printers.  Thus the book must have been legendary and unable to influence anyone.  The stories are too good to pass over thoughs which is why I like this sort of thing.  This stuff would make a good movie.

     Here is one version I just pulled up on the internet that I had not heard before.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/protocols.html

     Quote:

     Joly’s “Dialogues” while intended as a political satire, soon fell into the hands of a German anti-Semite named Herman Goedsche writing under the name of Sir John Retcliffe.  Goedsche was a postal clerk and spy for the Prussian secret police.  He had been forced to leave postal work due to his part in forging evidence in the prosecution against the Democratic leader Benedict Waldeck in 1849.  Goedsche adapted Joly’s ‘Dialogues’ into a mythical tale of a Jewish conspiracy as part of a series of novels entitled “Biarritz” which appeared in 1868.  In a chapter called “The Jewish Cemetery In Prague And The Representatives Of The Twelve Tribes Of Israel,” he spins the fantasy of a secret centennial rabbinical conference which meets at midnight and whose purpose is to review the past hundred years and to make plans for the next century.

     Unquote.

     To delet the paranoia I am familiar with the Goedsche story, this from Jewish sources only, but I have never heard of his using a copy of the Dialogues before.  As a government spy in a government post office I fail to see why the government wouldn’t have covered for him unless something else was involved.  In any event there is no shame on Goedsche involved.

He was simply doing his job for the government rather than the revolution. 

     My studies indicate that the chapter referred to was from a trilogy called ‘To Sedan’ that would indicat a publication date after 1871.  I have read the indicated chapter which is good Gothic stuff.  As a novel I see no reason to take the chaper seriously as history or based on Joly.  It may have happened, it may not have but the atmospheris care terrific and it moves the story along.  A nice bit of writing.  the bit about the representatives of the twelve tribes I took as a literary touch but then I’m not that sensitive on the matter.

     If the Jewish Virtual Library means to imply that the culture was not an organized political entity with specific political goals carried on in a conspiritorial manner than I would have to take issue with the wirter or writers.  As we have Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver’s testimony that sometime after 1666 when the Sabatai Zevi messiahship failed that the, shall we call them the Elders Of Zion, met and formulated the hope of the Jewish Revolution.  Virtually as Goedsche wrote the ‘elders’ of B’nai B’rith were sitting in Vienna in the company of Herr Doctor Professor Sigmund Freud planning to bring about the Revolution imminently.  While I don’t accept the novelist’s meeting of the Elders in the Prague graveyard as a fact I don’t think the idea can even be called a stretcher nor because of the story should Goedsche be defamed as an anti-Semite.  One would expect the culture to deny the story, naturally.

     Back to the Protocols.  It is not improbable that the culture disseminated the Protocols so that its proponensts could be defamed for

Maruice Joly

making a ‘forgery.’ After all mis- and disinformation is a part of the game.  One should always look for it.  In order to discredit the Protocols, and hence any notion of an international Jewish conspiracy, it was suddenly remembered, by whom it is never said, that the Protocols must have been based on the earlier Dialogues.  A great public search was instituted  throughout the great public libraries of Europe although if the edition had been confiscated and destroyed one wonders why.  Aw heck, in fairness, let’s disregard logic.  Needless to say the search was fruitless.  No copy could be found of this legendary book, not even that used by Herman Goedsche who we all know must have had one.  The suspense mounted hauntingly.  Would the Dialogues ever be found?  Not to worry.  An emigre soldier of Wrangel’s passing through Constantinople, now Istanbul,  had a copy missing cover and title page that he sold to a Jewish second hand book dealer.  I mean, this is good stuff; I wish the story wasn’t already taken.  This more than kind hearted book dealer paid good money for this piece of trash unable to even know what he had bought or what the book was about.  Stories of really human kind hearted bood dealers like this warm the heart.

     One doesn’t know in what language the book was printed, possible French, which fortunately this kind hearted Jewish second hand book dealer could read.  This fellow was also an expert on The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion.  What a concatenation of coincidences, hey?  As he was reading along to see what he might have bought he said to himself:  Wait a minute! I’ve read this before.  A light went on in his head.  By golly or perhaps, oy vey, he said to himself,  What I’ve got here must be the long lost Dialogues Entre Machiavelle Et Monstesquiou Aux Enfers.  Remember this was the first copy of this book anyone had ever seen except, possibly, Herman Goedsche.  Be damned it if wasn’t.  Filled with joy at his lucky buy the used book dealer turned the book over to B’nai B’rith or whoever and saved the day.  It was now ‘proved’ that the Protocols were a forgery based on the Dialogues.  Hey, listen, the Dialogues could have been a forgery themselves.  There’s a good chance even that the Nineteenth Century is a forgery.  The history of the nineteenth century is one of the more implausible stories.  I’ve heard.  What do you think.  At any rate this beat up copy of the Dialogues disappeared never to be found again.  One wonders where the copies now being published came from.

     So, the damage controllers enlisting the support of their Liberal allies shouted down their accusers.  For myself, the culture’s story is so fishy and contrived that I at the very least doubt the defense but I sure as heck like the story.  Could Conan Doyle have done any better?  Pshh…

     Well, so much for the prep work.  As there was no longer room in Russia for the dead Czar’s men a very large number of them fled to, where else, the United States of America.  Hence all those jokes about waiters who used to be Russian dukes.  Some of them were.  Among the emigres was a gentleman named Boris Brasol who just happened to have a copy of the Protocols in his back pocket.

     The plot thickens.  Gets really good.  Now, Henry Ford had been picked out as an anti-Semite back in ’14 when he ‘unilaterally’ doubled the prevailing wage.  This act was considered a blow at the Revolution.  No good deed shall go unpunished.

Hooray for Honkety Hank and his hootenanny automobile.

     Consequently Ford was lured into the Peace Ship deal of ’16 by the Jewish Rosa Schwimmer.  The folly was one from which Ford’s reputation never recovered although the idea of the Peace Ship isn’t as absurd as it sounds.  As a result of the Peace Ship Ford began to have his doubts about the sincerity and motives of the culture which were certainly justified.

      The doubts were sharpened into certainties by the role of Bernard Baruch and his Jews of the WIB and in the government.  It wil be remembered that the Dodge Brothers lost their lives because of a confrontation with Baruch while Ford had his company’s finances attacked as a result of the confrontation in 1919-20.  At that point Brasol showed up with his copy of the Protocols which he provided to Ford for the small sum of 10,000.  Ford then bought the Dearborn Independent which began to publish the articles that became the four volumes of the famed International Jew.

     Today these volumes are classed with the Protocols and are forbidden reading.  On the Coalition Index.  The Liberal Coalition has the bad habit of denying history by preventing its examination.  I haven’t leafed thrugh the Dearborn Independent  but there are a couple sample copies on the internet.  It was a pretty decent newspaper cum magazine of the uplifting sort.

http://www.rationalrevolution.net/special/library/dearborn_independent.html      

     The story of Ford and the Independent articles is an interesting study made more delicious by being forbidden.  One  knows how much better forbidden fruit tastes, doesn’t one?

     It should be remembered that the Jewish culture was especially active after the October Revolution, the fourth year of the Jewish Revolution.  the fourth through eighth years are especially important.  The AJC- American Jewish Committee- wished to ascertain where the centers of American resistance might be the strongest.  At sometime either during or after the War the AJC drew up something called the Jewish Bill Of Rights.  They sent it to prominent men and women to ascertain their stance toward the Jews.  Their responses or non-responses would determine if the recipient was an ‘anti-Semite’ or not.  If not, fine; if so then efforts would be made to marginalize or destroy them.  Edgar Rice Burroughs was sent a copy of this Jewish Bill Of Rights.  He failed the test by questioning one or more clauses while taking an independent attitude.  He was thus marked down for destruction.  It would be interesting to know to whom this questionnaire was sent and how they fared.

Horace And John Dodge

      As I noted the Dodges were assassinated in 1920 while Ford’s business was attacked.  It might also be noted that Ford was run off the road while returning home one night suffering injuries but nothing serious.  His Ford pulled him out of another one. 

     Had the bankers succeeded in filching Ford Motor Co. it would have been quite a coup.  At the time the company was valued by Ford at a billion dollars, a hundred billion in today’s dollars.  In the bankers valuation the company put on the market at that time could be made to produce three to five billion dollars.  As I said the Revolution was an expensive affair.  If the Jewish banking houses had been able to secure Ford they could have recouped a profit of as much as four or five billion in 1920 dollars for their projects.  You will be able to understant the sort of assault that was made on Ford.

     The coalition, which has written all the histories, characterizes Ford’s defensive maneuvers as cranky anti-Semitism which he displayed for no other reason than that he was an insane cranky anti-Semite who attacked Jews qua Jews.

     Nor were Ford’s Independent articles mere ranting without an understanding of the problem as some would have you believe.  The articles were written by William Cameron Ford’s employee.  Ford as usual did things in a thorough way.  Almost overnight he amassed a huge library concerning Judaism.  I mean, this was massive.  The Jews wanted it.  They asked him for it after the apology.  Ford sneered.  While the library is described as anti-Semitic it embraced the whole range of Jewish activities.  Perhaps a unique collection

     Cameron set to work master this huge mass of material.  The result was the four volumes of The International Jew with several uncollected articles left over.  While the volumes have been defamed as anti-Semitic balderdash they are nothing of the kind.  They are well researched accurate accounts of the topics covered.  The first volume dealing with the Protocols merely duplicates what already existed but the remaining three volumes recording the various roles of Jews in American are interesting studies and true, which is to say based on verifiable facts.  However as we have recently learned- the truth is no defense.

     When the articles began appearing they created quite furor.  If you have checked the Dearborn Independent samples on the internet site you will have an idea of what the paper looked like.  Just insert one of the Jewish articles and you have what the readers of the twenties saw.

     Ford’s liquid wealth in today’s terms was in the tens of billions of dollars so he was well able to afford a defense.  Mr. Deep Pockets.  He created something called the Service Department that was a counterspy outfit not unlike that of Daddy Warbucks of Little Orphan Annie fame.  It will be remembered that Little Orphan Annie made its debut at this time.  Ford Employed agents who were supposed to get the lowdown on Jewish activities such as those featured in the Dr. Mabuse series.  Starting from scratch the Service Department was no match for Jewish agences like the AJC, ADL or B’nai B’rith and others that had had decades if not centuries of experience in subversive activities.

     One only has the Coalition accounts of these years of the Jewish Revolution so the reader has undoubtedly been conditioned to view Ford as an insane crank.  To my knowledge no other accounts have appeared.  How contemporaries other than the Liberal side reacted isn’t recorded at present.  However Edgar Rice Burroughs tried in his modest way to assist Ford.’

     Ford and Burroughs were Americans raised on the ideals of that scrap of paper, the Constitution.  They therefore made the mistake of thinking that they could appeal to the reason of ideologues or bigots.  You can’t.  An ideologue has his projection and he knows he got it from from God.  As I have pointed out before a devout member of a religion must, of necessity, be a bigot; there is no room for any opinion that contradicts dogma.  So Ford and Burroughs were wasting their time.

     By 1924 Burroughs must have known he was under attack both demestically and internationally by the Communists.  His 1919 effort, Under The Red Flag, had signaled his antagonism to Communism just as his response to the Jewish Bill Of Rights signaled his refusal to be bulldozed from that quarter.

     Using material gleaned from the Independent concerning the role of Jews in the theatrical business Burroughs wrote a book entitled, Marcia Of The Doorstep in support of Ford and gently rebuking his fellow Americans for their authoritarianism.  The book didn’t see print until 1999.  The novel isn’t bad.  It would have sold reasonably well under the Edgar Rice Burroughs name.  As has been indicated the Liberal Coalition was in control of publishing; nothing was published that didn’t pass their censorship.  Burroughs novel was rejected.  Now, this is interesting.  Burroughs began his own imprint in 1930 eventually publishing all his titles but not, I repeat, not Marcia Of The Doorstep.  One might well ask  stayed his hand on that title.

     At any rate, probably as punishment, there were no Tarzan movies made by Jewish controlled studios from 1922 to 1928.  Ford also was having his problems.  The auto industry was p;rogressing faster than he was.  By 1927 the Model T was approaching obsolescence losing its sales lead to Chevrolet which it never recovered.

     It became necessary to call off his war with the AJC-ADL to concentrate on saving his business.  In 1927 he was forced to sign a bogus apology.  It was a forgery.  Ford had no hand in its writing.  However he promised to abandon the battle.

     With Ford’s collapse anything approaching to resistance to the Jewish Revolution in America collapsed.

     While the Republican interregnum of 1920-32 slowed the Revolution down the Liberal Wilsonian Revolution was resumed in 1933 by Wilson’s disciple Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  With Roosevelt the Jews returned to Washington in force.  Among the first things FDR did was to recognize the Soviet Union just as Jacob Schiff had immediately reversed the Jewish policy toward Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution by granting huge loans to the still nascent and insecure Bolshevik government.  This was OPM- other people’s money.  The money of the citizens of the United States Of America.  Thus the everyday American was forced to underwrite the Bolshevik Revolution whether he knew it or not.

Jacob Schiff- The PM     Schiff who was the Prime Minsister of the International Jewish Culture, was called down to Washington by the President of the United States to justify himself on the charges of Bolshevism.  He was apparently successful as when he left the capitol of the United States to got back to the Capitol of the Jewish Revolution, NYC, it was with a face wreathed in smiles.  Jacob Schiff didn’t smile often.  He quickly resumed his loans to the Bolsheviks.

To return to 1919.

This part if followed by Freud which is Part VI and the Deconstruction Of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ America without a part number which is Part VII.

Thanks for your interest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s