The European Holocaust

Part 6


R.E. Prindle

…Hitler slaughtered Jews…for no other reason than that they were Jews; whereas Stalin killed only those gentiles and Jews who displeased him.

William C.Bullitt, The Great Globe Itself

p.6.  When you have a good reason

you have a good reason.


A critical point in the run up to US entry into the European Holocaust was the discrediting of Charles Lindbergh in September 1941 over his Omaha speech for the America First Committee when he boldly stated that the only people who wanted war were the British, Roosevelt and the Jews.  While this was true and anybody who cared to know knew it was true the Jewish reaction was instantaneous.  The shriek of anti-Semitism filled the air from coast to coast.

As strange as it may seem the shriek was judge and jury to which there was no appeal.  The verdict was automatic.  Not only was the truth of Lindbergh’s assertion known at the time but subsequent research has proven the accusation.  The Jews denied it then, and still deny it today.

The trio’s guilt is a given the question is why was each of the three so anxious for a war they knew would imperil the very survival of civilization itself.  What did the three think they had to gain from a second world war piled on top of the first a mere twenty years previously.  As Roosevelt and the Jews began preparation for a war against Germany in 1933, a mere fourteen years since the end of the incredibly painful and destructive war, what could they possibly want?   Perhaps as was said the Armistice settled nothing, the job had to be finished.  What was the job?

To take the trio one at a time:

The English, provoked behind the scenes by Roosevelt were led by the belligerent Winston Churchill once the war began.  Both the English and French had been crippled by WWI from which they had had no time to recover either materially or the bleeding away of their male population.  The losses of men they endured in WWI are too horrendous to contemplate, one just accepts the totals.  The dislocations to the societies were tremendous.  As millions of men were slaughtered that meant millions of women were condemned to spinsterhood as potential husbands and fathers were removed from the mating pool.  Millions of children were condemned to be raised in poverty as their only support was their mother.

In 1940 the human and material resources were not there to fight another major war.  And it was known to all.  When Churchill asked how he thought the British could win another war he replied that the English couldn’t so that he was going to bring the Americans and their resources in to do it for them.  That was a fairly long shot and if the US came to the assistance of the English would it be in a timely manner?

Once the US was involved Churchill is reported to have told Roosevelt that between the two of them they could rule the world.  Such a thought was anathema to Roosevelt who was opposed to colonialism and imperialism in theory.  I’m sure he lost respect for Churchill at that point finally demeaning him in front of Stalin.

A possible reason then for Churchill’s desire for war  was the notion that the US would prop up the Empire that was tottering and could not survive the emerging consciousness of the twentieth century. If this scenario is probable at any event Roosevelt needed little prodding to commit the US; persuading the population to commit sons and resources for another European war proved to be impossible.

The key to the question of why Roosevelt was eager for another world war having experienced the first is a more difficult problem.

There is no question but that the Socialists had gained control and having gained control wished to keep it.  Indeed, if Wilson hadn’t crashed it seems clear that he intended to run for a third term to confirm the socialist seizure.  His stroke temporarily saved the US.  Roosevelt and Cox ran on a Wilsonian ticket in 1920.  They were crushed by Harding who wished to take the country back to a pre-Wilson America.  What Roosevelt’s reaction to his and Cox’s defeat would have been must remain unknown because he was struck down by polio the next year.  The attack was serious putting him down for months while he lost the use of both his legs.

Certainly becoming a paraplegic in the prime of manhood had a devastating effect on Roosevelt’s psychology.  Plus, the firestorm as the disease ravaged his mind must have made an indelible effect.  It must have had the effect of a couple atom bombs or fleets of bombers unloading over Dresden.

There is little doubt that Roosevelt believed his political career was over as well as for all practical purposes his life.  However others had as much or more invested in his political career than he.  As he lay suffering his mentor, Louis Howe, and his wife, Eleanor, worked assiduously to keep his career alive.  As also did the Jews.  FDR was barely out of his sick bed when Governor Al Smith dragooned him into running as his successor.  Seems a little strange, doesn’t it?  Al failed in his presidential bid but FDR was elected handily.

As governor he ran the Jewish and Smith program.  Performing handsomely he was picked for a second term and then received the presidential nomination in 1932.  The Jews now had their man ruling the US while believing themselves in power in the USSR. FDR immediately asked for dictatorial powers thus placing himself on a par with Stalin and the newly elected Hitler.  He also immediately became a warmonger as Wolf Hitler correctly called him.  He generally frustrated any attempts for a peaceful settlement of differences in Europe.

In the end he embroiled the whole world in his vision of Armageddon.  He alone could have authorized the savage genocide perpetrated on the Germans.  He alone could have authorized the virtual destruction of European civilization as city after city was flattened.  He most likely would have authorized the destruction of Notre Dame if he thought the Germans were using it just as US bombers flattened Monte Casino in Italy.

At the time Germans were removing art treasures, the heritage of Europe, from cities before the advancing troops of the US.  This was called the looting of Europe by Hitler’s enemies.  But, was it?  Is it not possible to interpret the removal and concealment of irreplaceable artefacts as preserving them before Roosevelt bombed them to smithereens.  Might their storage deep within the bowels of the Earth not be seen that way?   The bombing was a crime against humanity, make no mistake about that.

After the destruction of Monte Casino Europeans appealed to the mad Roosevelt to avoid bombing these European memories preserved in stone and on fragile canvasses.  Is it possible that the destruction of Dresden, perhaps the most beautiful city in the world was Roosevelt’s answer?  Was he remembering the destruction of his youth by the ravages of polio?  It is quite possible if not probable.

And of course Roosevelt was aided in his rape by his confederate Jews.  Long before the Jews had sworn to destroy Europe, its morals, its people and its civilization.  Freud’s psycho-analysis itself was an assault on the civilization of Europe now coming to fruition.  More than once they had destroyed whole peoples if their writings are to be taken at face value.  Does anyone today remember the Amalekites?  Think about Europe.

Gustavus Myers of The History Of The Great American Fortunes fame issued a curious volume in 1935 entitled America Strikes Back.  The odd little volume posits ‘Americans’ spitefully resent their treatment by Europeans over trifles.  And now in 1935 they are ‘striking back.’  Perhaps we should read ‘Americans’ as Jews striking back much as Capt. America of the comic books is a Jew who wears patriotic American paraphernalia as a disguise.

This nasty anti-European dogma would reappear undisguised in Theodore Kaufman’s 1940 pamphlet Germany Must Perish.  This was about to same time as the first issue of the comic book Capt. America appeared.  It was truly an open conspiracy.  It should be quite obvious from these examples that Lindbergh wasn’t talking through the back of his neck.

Apart from the genocidal blood thirstiness of Kaufman’s book the interesting thing is that it was well received.  Apparently Kaufman, a rather nondescript person, could afford to send out a few thousand copies as it was reviewed favorably by American newspapers.  Apparently Germanophobia cut deeply into American consciousness as the US was not yet at war with Germany.  Maybe Gustavus Myers was onto something.

Reaching its considerable national audience Time Magazine also gave the pamphlet a favorable review.  This is also interesting because Time was also infested with Communist cells while have an enormous Jewish cadre as writers and editors on its editorial board.  Even more intriguing Clare Booth, now married to Henry Luce the publisher of Time was previously the mistress of none other than Bernard Baruch who had been urging presidents to prepare for war beginning with Warren Harding while being very influential in the Roosevelt administration.

It pays to check into the people who financed Luce also.


Nor was Theodore Kaufman’s a lone wolf book.  He was part of a larger book organization that had been planning the destruction of Germany and Europe for centuries.  Certainly the latest excrescence went back for over a hundred years.  Certainly before the Communist Manifesto was gifted to the world.

In this case Kaufman’s theme came close to being realized by the very Jewish Henry Morgenthau Jr. who served Roosevelt as his Secretary of the Treasury.  The Treasury, hmm?  Morgenthau’s post-war dream was the complete eradication of Germany from the map, not unlike the eradication of Russia which was renamed the Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics.  Thus the Jews triumphed over the Russian Czars.

From 1943 to his death the dithering Roosevelt was either on duty in North Africa, Iran or the Soviet Union or in the arms of his harem down in Warm Springs so Morgenthau had nearly a free hand in furthering his designs.

While some guardian angel saved the German people from that fate that felt like the fate worse than death of novelists’ imaginations that was wished on them by the triumphant Children Of Light they probably did wish they were dead.

Morgenthau was only stopped by Roosevelt’s death.  Roosevelt waiting in the shack for the Grim Reaper rolling around in his sweet babies’ arms- that is, surrounded by women was in no position to administer the government so God only knows what fate might have awaited us if The Grim Reaper had been asleep at the wheel.

It seems clear then, even though massive volumes were written to prove the obvious point, that the Jews ardently wanted the ‘good’ war, they still deny it although the ‘good’ war could have been good for them alone.  It wasn’t good for my family.  If telling the truth makes Lindbergh an anti-Semite then, as the saying goes:  ‘We’re all anti-Semites now.’

Having nicely disposed of those problems let us now turn to examining the Roosevelt-Stalin nexus.  If the Col. House/Wilson friendship was the strangest on record, as has been written, then the Roosevelt/Stalin Nexus is truly incomprehensible.

In the thirties Stalin was consolidating his position.  When Lenin died, relatively young, in 1924, a power struggle ensued between Stalin and the Jewish champion, Leon Trotsky.  Trotsky lost, was exiled to the swamps of Central Asia, escaped, continued to flee Stalin who pursued him and finally caught up with him in Mexico where he was murdered in 1940.  One wonders what Trotsky might have to do with Stalin seeking to neutralize Hitler at that time?

Having captured the government Stalin was plagued by conspirators who had to be eliminated.  This was done in the Great Terror and show trials of 1936-38.  Numbers of victims vary wildly but might have approached a million before the terror abated.  I suppose one could compare it to the Great Terror of 1793 in France.  The Old Guard was all but eliminated along with many ranking military officers and the intelligentsia.  One of the major accusations was that the victims had been conspiring with the Germans.  For some reason this accusation is pooh—poohed by critics but nothing seems more reasonable to me.  Germany always figured prominently in Russian or Soviet politics.  In order to eliminate Stalin outside help was needed.  Where else but from Germany would it come?

The Ukraine was populated by German farmers who immigrated in the nineteenth century.  German technology and technicians were sought after.  Resentment against Stalin’s regime was inevitable.  Just as Hitler eliminated his internal adversaries on The Night Of The Long Knives why wouldn’t Stalin do the same?

Even Roosevelt tried to either purge or put his opposition in jail, that is, exile them to Siberia as it were.  It would seem inevitable that this brutal purge would cause some stir and resentment in revolutionary circles.  And it did.  Plots were formulated to assassinate Stalin.  One such plan was divined by the English writer H.G. Wells.

Wells had begun his rise to prominence in 1895 with the publication of his proto-scifi novel, The War Of The Worlds.  He put out a successful string of scifi-fantasy novels prior to WWI. Then he turned serious writing contemporary fantasies about sociology and politics.

Always a socialist the horrors of WWI disturbed his mind, first in the direction of religion and when God failed him he dedicated himself to the Revolution. The Revolution was centered in Moscow so he was driven into the Soviet camp.  As perhaps the most famous literary person of his time he had entre to both Lenin and Stalin, face to face.  He served an emissary of Stalin carrying messages back and forth between Stalin and Roosevelt.

The Soviets had a cadre of State prostitutes who were assigned to monitor various Western European writers serving as their concubines.  A woman named Moura Budberg was assigned to Wells.  Budberg had previously monitored the exiled Soviet writer Maxim Gorky.

Moura was a nice Jewish lady who apparently knew how to handle men.  Both Wells and Gorki were madly in love with her.  So was the English diplomat Bruce Lockhart that infuriated Wells, but that is another story.  At any rate Wells functioned as a Soviet agent.

His early very successful scifi career petered out at the beginning of the war.  After 1920 Wells turned out a succession of novels one after the other but they were commercially unsuccessful, read by few.  They tend to be a little tedious, even if you like Wells, as I do, in tune with his intellect, they are still lighted by a blighted genius.  The novels record the history of his day although in metaphorical terms.

So Moura Budberg was the love of Wells’ life but she was a Soviet Agent at the beck and call of Stalin.  She would disappear from Wells’ life from time to time on other assignments.  Wells didn’t probe into the absences too deeply but he did have a possessive attachment to her.

In the thirties when Gorki was dying having returned to Moscow, Stalin called Wells to the Capital.  Budberg had also been called to console Gorki.  She told Wells that she would be out of town.  Stalin then sadistically allowed Wells to see Moura and Gorky expressing affection.  This had a devastating effect on Wells’ psyche, wounding him to the depth of his soul.

At that point he began to conspire against Stalin.  As there were many revolutionaries now disaffected with Stalin, the Trotskyites most prominently, many were horrified by the show trials and Great Terror, Well’s Joined their ranks.

As I have tried to show much propaganda was disseminated through literature, novels and studies, that undoubtedly was meant to send messages to revolutionaries in the disguise of stories and analyses, Gustavus Myers being a prime example.  As Stalin was alert, paranoid as some would say, a great deal of caution was necessary for the conspirators of what Wells called an open Conspiracy.

In 1939 then Wells published his novel The Holy Terror.  I have no idea how many people read this obscure novel but I am sure I am one of the happy few.

The novel concerns a dictator named Rud who while necessary at the beginning of the revolution has now exceeded his usefulness having become an excruciating burden.  The problem is how to get rid of him as there is no hope that he will step down.

Wells’ solution was to get doctor’s to dispose of Rud in a medical way.

As a didactic work how was Wells’ suggestion taken by his fellow revolutionaries?  Perhaps they dismissed it but probably they heeded it although it took them about twelve years.  Sometime after, around 1950, Stalin did claim that he had uncovered a doctor’s plot to assassinate him.  The doctors were Jewish so Stalin’s response was to plan to round up the Jews of the USSR and send to the far Northern gulag, a sure death sentence or genocide.  At this point Stalin was not only killing people who displeased him but Jews qua Jews.

Fearing that they would be next Khrushchev and his fellows poisoned Stalin just before the order was executed in 1953 putting a period to his rule.  A doctors’ plot could have been a coincidence with Wells’ novel but I rather suspect the conspirators were picking that choice.

In any event if Stalin had feared a conspiracy involving Germany he took the time, mid-1938, to invite Hitler to join him in a non-aggression pact.  If he was worried about a German led conspiracy the pact would have been a good way to disarm it.

Stalin was the cagiest of the dictators.  He was controlling a worldwide Communist conspiracy from the Moscow that was the center of the spider’s web. To the East he was attempting to annex China’s adjacent Sinkiang province, Mongolia and Manchuria, with the intention of capturing China, thus defeating the anti-Communist Japanese.  To the West his Comintern agents were in action in all countries.

In the East the Japanese sought to restrain his advances while in the West his only threat came from Germany and Italy while his agents active in every Western country were slowly undermining the ‘peace loving democracies.’

The West didn’t know what to make of Stalin’s sudden about face with Germany, one day denouncing Hitler and the next embracing him.  As it seems probable that the Terror extended into 1940 it was necessary for Stalin to mop up the remains of the revolt against him.  True, a lot mistakes we made but what’s that compared to wiping out the viper’s nest.

Still, in Roosevelt’s mind possibly, the Socialist capital of the world was made safe as he fought against the ‘Isolationists’ at home who prevented his attacking the arch-Satan, Wolf Hitler, and wiping that counter-revolutionary vipers’ nest from the face of the earth.

It was probably with horror he received the news that the ‘aggressor nation’ had invaded the ‘peace loving democracy’ of the USSR.  Having already inaugurated the Lend-Lease program with Great Britain he set in motion plans to supply the West’s arch enemy, or new ally as it were, with billions of dollars’ worth of free goodies no strings attached.  An unparalleled breath taking display of altruism never seen in the world before.

FDR had been promising the mothers of the country for years that he would not send their sons to fight in foreign wars.  HE would not send their sons…what deranged egotism is that?  Was he admitting that he was a dictator?  He lied, of course.  He reached up his sleeve for that old ace in the hole.

As Hoover had preached for years, boycotts and embargoes was an invitation to war.  He vetoed his then Secretary of War Henry Stimson’s embargo efforts against Japan and now that same Henry Stimson was Roosevelt’s Secretary of War still advocating embargoes.  Japan was embargoed and within weeks it sent its RSVP to Hawaii- Pearl Harbor.

Hitler very foolishly, perhaps in despair because Japan shifted South rather than attacking Stalin in the North, declared war on the United States even though the American people were stoutly resisting entering the European war.

Did Stalin need those billions and billions of dollars’ worth of US resources to defeat the Nazis?  I don’t think so.  He was ready, if surprised.  He moved industrial plants beyond Moscow, taking three and a half million Jews to safety with him.  If the Nazis found six million Jews to murder I have to wonder where they found them, or did they manufacture them like so many golems?

As the war began there were few in authority who didn’t think that the US-USSR alliance would handily defeat the Nazis.  It was money in the bank.


What Was The Intent Of The War?

It is very difficult to believe that Hitler was not maneuvered into the war by both Roosevelt and Stalin.  It is true that Hitler was rectifying the crimes of the Versailles Peace Treaty in an aggressive manner but it is equally true that both FDR and Stalin saw the Axis- Germany and Italy- as an obstruction to their plans for a socialist utopia.  Germany had to be removed much as the people of the Vendee were during the French Revolution.

One can only see Stalin’s offer to divide Poland with Hitler as a trap into which Hitler stepped, to lure him into a war with France and England.  Both Hitler and Stalin must have known of Poland’s treaties with France and England.

Stalin might have envisioned a stagnant trench warfare as in WWI that would have disabled all three countries allowing the Soviets to occupy not only East Poland but the whole of Europe.  With Europe in his pocket the removal of Japan as an irritant would have been small potatoes while adding that country as a Soviet republic.

This situation must have been obvious to Roosevelt and his very intelligent State Department, not to mention his super-intelligent Jews.  Given Jewish claims to massive intelligence it is impossible that they could have missed the implications.  To claim otherwise would be to demean themselves.

Perhaps then Stalin never thought that the USSR would ever be invaded by Germany or anyone else.  Perhaps he actually was caught by surprise.

Roosevelt and his Jewish advisers must then have had another or ancillary reason for wanting to go to war.  That must have involved the takeover of the US by the ‘true Americans’- the Jews as well as the destruction of Europe.

Indeed the Jews had a terrific organization, organized to work in many different areas simultaneously so that their actions would be disguised in the whirl of movement while any particular group of opponents could only find time to deal with one aspect of the assault if they recognized it as that.  Having been propagandized to believe the Jews were sacrosanct there was small reason they would do that and having done it found anyone to listen to them.

The Treasury was theirs.  The Dept. was Jewish top to bottom with the Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. ably seconded by the vicious Harry Dexter White.  Perfectly disguised because of the name; I’m sure most people didn’t know White was Jewish.

Morgenthau, seconding Theodore Kaufman, originated a plan for the extermination of the Germans that he began implementing in post-war Germany before a horrified Truman, I hope he was horrified, removed him from office.  Morgenthau also gave the plates to print occupation script to the Soviets.

In the interim from 1940 to 1944 the Jews conducted a pogrom to put all ‘Isolationists’ and pre-war dissidents behind bars, that is in ‘concentration camps.’  At the same time they were working desperately to prevent the execution of the convicted chief of Murder Inc, Louis Lepke Buchalter who the foremost Jewish criminal of the time.

Perhaps Hitler’s easy victory in the West disturbed Stalin’s plans but they solidified Roosevelt’s.  He took the back door in by forcing Japan to attack in the West of the US.

Once in the European war what exactly was the battle plan?  The Jews wanted not only Germany but all Europe destroyed as they still do.  To change Gustavus Myers’ title a bit it might have been called The Jews Strike Back At Europe Using American Men And Materiel.  Roosevelt wanted Germany destroyed as an enemy of the Socialist utopia.

It appears that from the very first it was determined to bomb Europe flat.  Destroy the whole continent.  The first plane having flown a few hundred feet in 1903, a mere 37 years later the US could launch whole flotillas of super bombers carrying payloads of bombs enough to terrify the whole world.  The films of the big B17s and 24s dropping those long, long strings of mega tons of bombs on civilians is enough to terrify anyone even distanced from reality by film.

I don’t know how anyone can read of the Horror of Dresden crying for poor deluded, insane homo sapiens.

That’s not the worst of it.  Germany aided by Jews, had been working on the Atomic Bomb.  Roosevelt knew from nothing about atomic bombs.  But, the Jews wanted the US to develop the A-Bomb because as they feared the Germans might succeed first, the use of the weapon would disturb their plans.

Emissaries failing to move Roosevelt, who was too slow or unbelieving to grasp the idea, the Jews pulled out their Physics shill Albert Einstein whose reputation apparently could move Roosevelt so he jumped to it establishing the Manhattan Project.  This was a crash project as the Jews hoped to have the bomb ready to obliterate Germany and Europe putting paid to that age old rivalry.

It was only because the Bomb was completed too late for Europe that it was used against Japan.  The Japanese would never have seen it if the Soviets had slowed down their advance by a few months.  There would have been no complaints if the Bomb had been used on Germany nor would that have any irradiated German maidens been sent to the US for treatment.

So, if the Germans were war criminals the Jews and the US were no less war criminals for the attempt to erase German and European civilization with the bombing campaign and the great crime against humanity committed against Germany in the aftermath of the war which was no less than that.

How to decide the responsibility between Roosevelt and his Jewish auxiliaries?  When Roosevelt was sworn into office for his third term he was already a physical wreck. Almost immediately after his fourth inauguration he died.   The four years of his third term are the only relevant ones here.

Whatever FDR’s physical and mental capacity was for the first two years of the term by 1943-44 he appeared to have nearly been on life support.  He gives no evidence that he was able to concentrate.  For Stalin at Teheran and Yalta it was like taking candy from a baby.  Unable to face down the Soviet leader he was being cut down from behind by US Communists led by Alger Hiss in his administration.  I doubt if FDR was even half there.

His whole administration from 1933 to 1945 was one of catering to the Soviets.  Fortunately he died or the US would have had nothing left to give away.

Well, the US did have something more to give away.  Before FDR bought the farm he sent it away to San Francisco to be used by his cherished creation of the United Nations.  The UN has never been a viable organization; it has been a mere plaything of the US wholly financed by US taxpayers while working against US interests with the full compliance of the US government.  Truly Roosevelt was such a generous man that he would give his enemies the shirts off our backs.


As should be clear from events occurring today in the US the Jews consider themselves a separate people from Whites and Negroes having nothing in common with either.  For a decade or two now the ex-Harvard professor Noel Ignatiev has been chanting that Whites must disappear from the Earth while Jews are now rapping out a catichel tune I’m Not White, I’m Jewish.  So having begun a race war between Negroes and Whites the Jews excuse themselves from being considered White by declaring they are Jewish.

Any such current happenings, of course, have their origins deep in the past.  Thus in 1933 when the Jewish spokesman Samuel Untermyer declared a holy war, that is jihad, against Germany, safe on American shores, he was essentially condemning them to a genocidal attack by religious fanatics.

A lawyer declaring a religious war and heeded?  Obviously something is going on here that 99% of US Aryans have no knowledge or even suspicion.  Obviously if a hysterical Jew declares a holy war against Germany he could just as easily declare it against the US.  And in fact that is what we have today being waged against US Aryans.

The fact was that the Jews having declared war they had no means to fight it.  No army, no country from which to stage it, nothing that in ordinary terms constitute resources, so where was the menace in the Jews’ declaring war on anyone?  The menace quite simply was that in Europe the Jews were going to get the Soviets with their resources to humble Germany; while in the West having the Roosevelt administration of the US under their control they were going to use White boys, Aryans, and the ‘inexhaustible resources’ of the US.  Just as today they are going to use Negroes to do the fighting while they sit back waiting to reap the harvest.

Thus in WWII they were able to field thirty million soldiers and huge productive capacity against a few million Germans with pitifully small material resources.  Why would Roosevelt and Stalin take up this ‘good’ war, this Jewish war?  You are going to have to tell me.

From 1914 to 1945 it is impossible to tell what anyone but the Jews were thinking.  There just seems to have been a destructive frenzy that seized minds.

When Bismarck unified the German State in 1871 he upset a centuries old balance of power.  Germany had been a congeries of small principalities that were perceived as comic opera, humorous novels of a mythic Ruritania.  After unification they were the most populous European State after Russia.   They equaled the combined populations of England and France.  Not only were they twice as big, they were twice as smart.  I would go so far as to say they were the summit of human evolutionary development; what the English writer Bulwer-Lytton described in his novel The Coming Race or H.G. Wells new race in his The Food Of The Gods.  I’m serious now.  The Germans could out compete France and England in every field while leaving the Russians eating dust.  The bravos of the US found it tough sledding going against them in trade.  Hence we have a deep seated German hatred born of fear and frustration.  That is why the Jews hated them; they were what Jews aspired to be but were genetically incapable of.

So what recourse did Jews, Brits, the French, Russians and Americans have?  To murder the whole goddamned lot.  Hence from the very start of a war that could have been settled peacefully the war was genocidal from beginning to end.

Through the US the Jews were able to conduct a bombing campaign that not only destroyed Germany but half the rest of Europe.  Perhaps there was some maniacal feeling that everything had to be destroyed to begin all over again.

In this orgy of destruction and murder the Jews overlooked one thing.  That thing was that genocide cuts both ways.  When Theodore Kaufman advertised the true Jewish goal in his polemic Germany Must Perish he cleared the way in German thinking to determine that if one or the other was to perish it would be the Jews.  Hitler had the means and the will.

So in the European Holocaust in which God only knows how many lives were sacrificed or destroyed, perhaps one or two hundred million, half the infrastructure and glory of European civilization, there was a small collateral damage of a few million Jews perishing.   Six million is a poetic figure consistent with Biblical mythology but the before and after numbers don’t add up.  It seems like there were as many survivors of the death camps in after decades as there had been Jews in the camps; and nearly a century later they keep on coming seemingly multiplied.  The intent was definitely there but I think the execution fell far short of perfection.

Even so Kaufman’s polemic was just a shot across the bow, the real genocidal scheme was cooked up in Jewish councils and enunciated by their man Henry Morgenthau Jr. who served as FDR’s Secretary of the Treasury- of the Treasury.

The Morgenthaus were an influential Jewish family dating back to the turn of the century.  Henry’s father, Henry, served as the US ambassador to Constantinople or what is the Turkish Istanbul.

During the late nineteenth century and the early twentieth century Istanbul was a world crossroads and great listening post hence the US Jews claimed the post as their own.  For maybe half a century all the ambassadors to Turkey were Jews.

It was while the elder Morgenthau was ambassador that the seeming solution to the Protocols of Zion problem was resolved.  A mutilated copy of the Dialogues Between Montesquieu and Machiavelli was supposedly purchased by a Jewish used goods seller from a fleeing soldier of Wrangel’s army who just happened to have a slightly used copy in his back pocket.

As there must have been a cadre of Jews roaming the city for information it is possible if not probable that between themselves and Morgenthau they cooked up the Dialogues fraud.  At any rate Henry Jr. came from a distinguished family of Zionist operatives.

As his father may have cooked up the Dialogues son Jr. obviously working with Jewish operators cooked up the Morgenthau post-war German genocide plan.

Thus the holy war declared by Samuel Untermyer in 1933 was augmented by writings such as those of Gustavus Myers from ’33 to ’43 and in 1940 by Theodore Kaufman’s enunciated Genocidal Jewish intentions in his pamphlet Germany Must Perish.  The wish if not the plan was undoubtedly embedded in the Jewish mind for five hundred years or so.

Strangely Germans Must Perish has been ignored by Western historians.  However the discovery of the Wansee Conference sends shivers of horror down their legs.  The Folio Society, English publishers of old titles, recently published a copy of the Wansee Conference and the Final Solution.  Their blurb reads like this:


In 1947, American prosecutors were collecting information for the Nuremburg trials when they discovered a few pieces of paper stamped Geheime Reichssache (secret Reich matter).  These were the minutes of a meeting between top Nazi civil servants, SS officials, and party representatives on 20 January 1942.  It has been called ‘perhaps the most shameful document of modern history’.


Kaufman, undoubtedly with help from the Jewish hierarchy, wrote what must certainly have the previous most shameful document of modern history in 1940.  Two years later the Germans responded in kind while the Jewish genocidal warfare was raining down on them from the skies.   Why is one the most shameful document in modern history and the other ignored?

Buried in the middle of their demolished cities faced with implacable enemies the German situation was dire.  Much suffering could have been avoided if both Roosevelt and Stalin had not insisted on unconditional surrender.  What that term means is that the vanquished turn over their bodies to be used as their victims wish.  Unlike conditional surrender that might say the vanquished keep their weapons and return home in amity bygones be bygones for example, under unconditional surrender the vanquished have no rights whatsoever.  Ask the people of the American South in the wake of the Civil war.

Hitler tried to surrender but Roosevelt and Stalin refused to accept it preferring to continue their genocide of the Germans.  I repeat, those genocidal intentions had no reference to anything that happened to the Jews.  Thus while a surrender did take place, by that time the smoking ruins were fully occupied.

The horrors committed by the Children of Light post-war were too unpleasant for me to offer any details here.  I refer the reader to the book Hellstorm for an account of the brutal occupation of Germany by all the allies, no exceptions, but the US and the USSR were the worst, well, the French had an oar in the pond.  As I have been careful to point out the Jews were the first to declare war, first to proclaim genocidal intent and influential in directing the genocide in the post-war period.  And they have continued to exact pounds of flesh ever since while continuing to plot the destruction of the Aryan race.

Given that the Europeans lost hundreds of millions in dead or ruined lives, millions of precious cultural artefacts through bombing, what if a couple million Jews died also?  That Americans and Europeans place these miniscule Jewish losses above their own in significance and value is incomprehensible.  That Aryans find any guilt at all rather than disdain and vengeance is one fabulous success story of incessant Jewish propaganda.

Aryans should stop moping and get on with their lives with no regard for the victimizing Jews.  Quarantine the aggressor.

I think the Jews owe the world an apology.  They have nothing with which to make reparations.


Exhuming Bob 21:

Will The Real Bob Dylan…? 


      Our friend Bob Dylan has given the impression that he knew nothing of Barry Obama, The Great Black Hope, until the summer of 2008 with just a few months left in the campaign when he gave the candidate his endorsement.  Surely this isn’t so.  Surely he not only knew of the Hope but knew him personally probably before 9/11/01.

     In my essay Bill Ayers, Greil Marcus, Bob Dylan and Barry Obama on my Contemporary Notes blog, linked above, I posit that all four knew each other and of 9/11 before it happened.  Impossible, huh?  Stranger things have happened.

     I hadn’t thought about it much after writing my piece but then a few days ago- 7/22/09- I came across a post by one Lark, The Times Are A Changing (Again):  Bob Dylan On Obama.  Lark quotes Dylan on Obama in the London Times.  Let’s review it:

     Dylan begins:  “Well you know right now America is in a state of upheaval.”

     True enough.  Many sorts of upheaval.  What sort of upheaval does Dylan refer to:

Bomber Billy Ayers

     Poverty is demoralizing.

     Can’t argue with that.  Is he talking about coal miners, fruit pickers, the unemployed, or what?

     You can’t expect people to have the virtue of purity when they’re poor.

     More problematic here.  Purity isn’t a virtue it’s a state or condition.  Has nothing to do with poverty.  Well, Dylan’s a poet, one of the enigmatic kind, so I presume he may mean honest by pure.  But which people, is he talking about Blacks?

     Well, I come from a long line of poor people and so far as I know we were the kind described as ‘poor but honest.’  In other words we didn’t steal or cheat.  I’m not sure how scrupulous we were about lieing.  Seems to be a much more common fault.  I’ve been around the block a few times now and I’ve come to the conclusion that crime has nothing to do with poverty.  Rich or poor a thief steals and is well able to justify his thefts.  Need I point out the 50 billion dollar thief Bernie Madoff?  Or about the raft of Rabbis just arrested in New Jersey for some very serious financial crimes.  And then I read about this reasonably well off  one guy who stole some records because he thought he could use them better than the rightful owner.  So it may be common to think you have to be poor to be ‘impure’ or dishonest but mistaken nevertheless.

     Bob makes himself a little more clear:

     But we’ve got this guy out there now who is redefining the nature of politics from the ground up…Barack Obama.

     Naive but sincere.  Spoken like a true cheerleader.  ‘This guy out there’ sounds like affection if not familiarity to me.  So now, when and how did Dylan become aware of the Hope?  As I conjecture it Greil Marcus is the key to the riddle.  I’m guessing, but my guess is that Marcus’ curiosity led him to introduce himself  or be introduced to Bill Ayers, the ole Mad Weatherman Bomber,  probably in Chicago.  Ayers and Marcus being of the school of  Whiteness is a plague on the Earth probably quickly came into accord.  And then the Hope was probably on the way under the sponsorship of Ayers so Marcus and the Hope were introduced when certain anti-American and anti-White plans were discussed probably among them a projected attack on America.  Certainly one remembers that Ayers had already made several bomb attacks on America so why not the Big One…the Really Big One…the World Trade Center.

Greil Marcus

    Dylan and Marcus are pretty close.  Dylan is either a Lubavitcher or close to them.  Lubavitchers hate Whites, especially of the Christian sort.  That partially excludes me by the way, White but not of the Christian persuasion.

     As it appears that Dylan was much more familiar with the Hope than he let on and his album Love And Theft seems to reflect a pre-knowledge of 9/11 coupled with Marcus’ Rolling Stone article as detailed in the link to my essay above, there is every reason to believe, or think, or fear that Dylan, Marcus, Ayers and Obama were privy to 9/11 well before it happened.  Possibly if not probably in on the planning stages.

     Dylan goes on:  He’s redefining what a politician is, so we’ll have to see how things play out.

     If the Hope is redefining what a politician is then the definition is toward that of an African chief.  An African chief owned every bit of his territory personally.  He owned every inhabitant as his slave to dispose of as he wished.  He was free to do with all as he chose with or without their consent.

     That seems to be how the Hope  is playing things out.  True, the Hope is somewhat hobbled by the remains of the old political system but with his Liberal allies he has so far met with no insuperable resistance.  To oppose his plans is to be vile.  So far the fear of being considered vile has prevailed.

     Then Dylan:  Am I hopeful?  Yes.  I’m hopeful that things might change.  Some things are going to have to.

     Well things have changed.  Many of us believe the way things are changing is in a direction more destructive than beneficial.  In short the Hope is already a complete failure.  We’d all be pleased to have a detailed opinion from Dylan on whether his hopes have been realized.

Barack Obama     Dylan then closes with a platitude:  You should always take the best from the past, leave the worst back there and go forward into the future.

     Yep.  Sure enough.  I suppose the argument would break down over the issue of what’s best or worst and which has been left behind.    There’s no doubt we’re headed into the future.  Some kind of future at least.



A Review

Thuvia, Maid Of Mars


Edgar Rice Burroughs.

Part III-C


Review by R.E. Prindle

Edgar Rice Burroughs

Edgar Rice Burroughs

Civilization And Its Malcontents

     Let us say that for the fifty years or so before the 1920s there was a growing sense of societal malaise.  This malaise was reflected most notably in the creation of  Edgar Rice Burroughs’ psychological projection, Tarzan Of The Apes.   One has to account for the immediate acceptation by society of such an absurdity.  Tarzan, in fact, completely rejected civilization for the life of the  romantic ‘unrestrained freedom’ of the jungle.  The noble savage in fact.

     Thus in a metaphor Burroughs reflected the malaise of his time so brilliantly that his creation was accepted as virtually a real person.  Writers like Grant and Stoddard put the same theme into more scholarly terms.  As noted, contrary to Richard Slotkin’s idea, Grant had little or no influence on Burroughs while the slightly later Lothrop Stoddard whose three relevant works appeared only from 1920 to 1922 could have had no influence on Burroughs’ formative years.   It seems probable that Burroughs did read Stoddard and was influenced by his work but only after his ideas were fully formed.  Even then  The Revolt Against Civilization appeared after Burroughs had examined some of the same problems in his rejected manuscript, Under The Red Flag of 1919.

     The problem of the malcontents and their war on civilization was examined by a number of writers during the twenties and thirties so why Slotkin singled out Burroughs, Grant and Stoddard isn’t as clear as it might be.  Postwar German cinema was intensely concerned with the matter as why should it not?  Germany was under asault by what Stoddard called the Underman.  Nor need Slotkin think Stoddard was alone.  I’m sure there were dozens of forgotten books prophesying the end of the world by one means or another including the Undermen of Communism.


     The Underman, or the Communist, was not even a term unique to Stoddard.  Gustave Le Bon, the French scholar on whose work Sigmund Freud based his study Group Psychology And The Analysis Of The Ego wrote prolifically on the psychological foundations of the Underman.  Freud based his book on Le Bon’s 1895 study  The Psychology Of Crowds.  Unless I’m mistaken he based his 1930 study Civilization And Its Discontents on Le Bon’s 1921 book The World In Revolt: A Psychological Study Of Our Times.

     On the cinematic side the problem was examined in the great silent films The Cabinet Of Dr. Caligari and Fritz Lang’s 1922 film Dr. Mabuse, The Gambler.  Lang would follow that ten years later with the sound film The Testament Of Dr. Mabuse.

     Even though Buroughs’ Under The Red Flag was rejected in 1919 he persisted, rewriting and extending the text into the 1926 story, The Moon Maid.   This story reflects a possible reading of The Revolt Against Civilization but such a reading was much more evident in 1934’s Tarzan And The Lion Man.

     The development of the problem was evident to all these writers which it seems to have escaped Slotkin who attributes the recognition of societal evolution to mere ‘racism’ in the writers.  One thinks that perhaps Slotkin is too involved in his own agenda.

     Rider Haggard enunciated the problem quite clearly in his 1888 novel Allan Quatermain  in which Quatermain grouses about the ‘strict limits’ of civilization compared to the ‘natural’ life of the African Zulus.  It might almost seem that the idea of Tarzan arose in Burroughs’ mind from that observation.  In fact science was undermining all the comforting beliefs that mankind had been settled in for a hundred thousand years.  During that long period characterized by the mental mode of what is called mythopoeic thinking man’s mind devoid of true knowledge projected a vision of reality that resulted in the notion of God.  Thus reasoning from insufficient knowledge man’s mind came up with an erroneous result.  You can’t get out of a mind what isn’t in it; all education is suggestion.

     As Freud was to say, man’s settled view of reality received its three great shocks when Galileo disproved the geocentric notion of the universe, Darwin disproved the uniqueness of man’s position in the animal kingdom and he, Freud, displaced the conscious mind with his vision of the unconscious mind.  Once again Le Bon was there ahead of him.

     Thus as the nineteenth century opened and progressed the bases of mankind’s notions of reality were shattered leaving him emotionally and intellectually bereft of foundations of belief.  Adrift without an anchor.

     As if that were not bad enough the great cataclysm that ushered in the modern era, The French Revolution, was based on the the absolute notion that not only were all men created equal but remained equal in all aspects of their existence.  The advance of civilization would toss this certainty into the trash can of history also.

     As civilization placed greater and greater demands on the intelligence and self-discipline of men and women the incontestable gap between those less intelligent and those more intelligent became more and more obvious.  Thus as the century progressed the notion of the Overman and the Underman began to become clear.

     At the same time the first tentative efforts at measuring the intellectual potential of the individual began to become possible.  Of course the basic inequality of men and women in its physical aspect had always been apparent.  Some men were naturally stronger and better muscled than others.  But, even that was changing. The science of physical culture was making it possible for the 98 lb. weakling to develop himself into a man mountain.  Thus artifically developed srongmen like the Great Sandow ushered in the golden age of the strong man topped off by Charles Atlas who guaranteed he could turn you into a man mountain if you followed his program.

     There was the promise that you could dethrone that bully and kick sand back in his face.  On the other side Francis Galton was originating the first primitive tests to measure intelligence potential.  Burroughs would have seen both proponents during his miraculous summer of 1893 at the Chicago Columbian Exposition.  I mean to say that both facts entered his mind where they could be digested and emerge later.  Nothing can come out of your mind that didn’t go in it.

     And then after the turn of the century Binet devised he first actual IQ test.  Thus, just as Sandow and Atlas could measure the size of muscles, the psychologists became able to measure the intelligence potential.  Those with high IQs were set up; those with low IQs were cooked.  The upshot was that all men were not created equal nor could they ever attain intellectual equality.


     To a very large extent what became the Communist Party recognized the inequality while demanding equality against reason.  Recognizing subconsciously, perhaps, that men could never be intellectual equals rather than try the futile task of raising the less fortunate they sought to destroy education which brings out the inequality but doesn’t create it.   No matter what happens there are always going to be the more intelligent just as there will always be the physically stronger.  As Le Bon points out, if you needed to hear it, nature don’t know from equality.

     Thus the Communist Party devised the well sounding slogan- From each according to his ability; to each according to his need.  Good plan for the needy, slavery for the able.  The needy were organized beginning their struggle to achieve superiority by collective action.  This was accomplished in Russia in 1917.  The battle was joined.

     Just as individuals are created with different capabilities so are peoples and races.  Some can achieve and some can’t.  Slotkin who must be a Communist thus takes offence at what he perceives to be, and is, an attitude of White Supremacy in Burroughs, Grant and Stoddard.  While I am aware there are those who will disagree with White superiority it is nevertheless not an attitude but an evolutionary fact.  That is the reason Communists have Darwin under attack.  While Darwin doesn’t say it, it is the inevitable result of his studies.  Just as it was necessary for the Undermen to destroy education in the hopes of creating intellectual equality so it became necessary to destroy White achievement of the last five hundred years.  The whites must be demonized and made to feel evil and inferior morally.  That is the import of Slotkin’s Gunfighter Nation.

     At that level all three writers are guilty.  As has been stated in Canadian courts- Truth is not a defense.  So there’s nothing to discuss.  Might is right and whoever has the might will prevail.

     It is a fact that all three writers were anti-Communists so it may be assumed that whatever Communists believe, they didn’t.  And why should they?  Might may be right but it can still be nonsense.  Communism is a flawed ideology based on a false premiss.  It always fails wherever it is introduced.  Failure is not evidence of a bad plan in Communist eyes.  One just continues to shovel sand against the tide and pray.  So succeed or fail they always think they can succeed by the same flawed ideology.  The fault for failure lies elsewhere.

     In that sense Burroughs was wasting his time assailing this religion of failure with his Under The Red Flag and its successor The Moon Maid.  The only people who would applaud his effort would be we non-Communists but he could never convince anyone with Communist leanings.  Of course that wasn’t well understood at the time.


     If Burroughs were accused of not believing in equality that would be true.  Not only are John Carter and Tarzan superior to any contemporaries on two worlds but Burroughs has a whole hierarchy of value.  John Carter is the Warlord of Mars ruling from the top city  of Mars, Helium.  The races of Mars pretty much reflect those of  Earth and their relative stations.  The main exception is the ruling Red race.  As Whites do and have existed on Mars in Burroughs stories  while at one time being the dominant race perhaps the Red race is some sort of amalgam of the various Eropean immigrants of the United States.  I believe the Green Men represent the American Indian.  Both roam the great plains while being essentially savages.

     Tarzan though always spoken of as being White is described as a bronze giant.  Bronze is a fairly dark metal so that Tarzan and the Red men of Mars may be more or less identical in color.

     Tarzan is the man-god so there are none superior or even equal to him.  Below him come the English who are the cream of mankind.  Perhaps slightly below the English are the French and then the rest of the Whites.  Tarzan himself is psychologically an animal having been raised by the Apes.  Not your ordinary gorilla or Chimp but a species intermediate between Gorilla and the Negro.  Slotkin hasn’t read enough Burroughs to make an intelligent comment but the undeniable attitude of Burroughs is enough for Slotkin to condemn him as an unregenerate bigot.  The reader may believe as he likes.  I have stated my opinion eslewhere and that is enough. Whether any of these opinions of Burroughs influenced American soldiers at My Lai is open to question.  The burden of proof is on Slotkin and he hasn’t provided  it.

     Along with the Undermen however, speaking through Tarzan, Burroughs is heartily discontented with civilization.

      The spectacle of Chicago of the 1890s as a dirty unpleasant place haunts Burroughs.  In contrast to the great White City of the Columbian Expo was what was afterwards known as the Black City of everyday Chicago.  The contrast was so strong and so offensive to the Undermen that within a year of the Expo’s closing the entire White City was burned to the ground with the exception of one building.  Hence perhaps the decayed crimson and gold ruins of Opar and the crimson and gold twin cities of Helium.  One wonders what effect the sight of the ruin of the White City had on Burroughs when he revisited the site sometime after his miraculous summer of ’93.  The mind creates nothing from nothing so there must have been models of the great cities of ERB’s imagination.

     There are points at which Burroughs and Communism have quite similar views.  It will be remembered that Burroughs only reluctantly married and throughout his life expressed discontent with the institution.  To some extent or other ERB must have been an advocate of free love.  Communists would have heartily approved of ERB’s women who went nude except for certain ‘adornments.’  Communists of course want women to be accesible to any man who wants them at any time while they have always advocated bare breasts.

     In many ways when the Communists appropriated Tarzan for the MGM movies it took but slight changes to make Tarzan conform to their ideals.   The MGM Tarzan and Jane were not married.  While Burroughs’ Tarzan was a highly educated on-again off-again sophisticate the MGM Tarzan was a stupid illiterate oaf and one who rejected the attributes of civilization high up there in the Cloud Cuckoo Land of the Mutia Plateau.

     On the essentials though Burroughs rejected the demands of the Underman as The Moon Maid clearly shows.  There was very little in Stoddard’s The Revolt Against Civilization that Burroughs would have disagreed with.  At the same time there was probably very little he didn’t already believe although he had never codified his information as Stoddard had.  Slotkin’s contention that Burroughs was influenced by either Grant or Stoddard is surely wrong.  ERB had already taken hs positions before either men had begun to write.

     Each writer was, in his own way, an advocate of White Supremacy.  It now become clear that White Supremacy has nothing to do with a fringe element in Liberal ideology.  All Whites are White Supremacists in that ideology unless they reject ‘White skin privilege’  whatever that is.   Ayers and Dorhn explain in their recent Race Course In White Supremacy.  Interestingly constructed title.  Nor as Slotkin would have it is the attitude based on mere racial pride and bigotry but on a solid record of achievement unattained by any other people.  The quesiton is not was it right for some people to rule or be supreme because in the nature of things some people will rule and be supreme but which of the peoples are most qualified to be supreme.

     All people have had equal opportunity so that one can only conclude that the race has gone to the most qualified participant.  In the contest the Whites  unified the other peoples against them as must inevitably be the consequence of being the top people.  As they say, getting there is the easy part; staying there is the hard part.

     Slotkin merely represents the envious losers, the Undermen.  who clutch at any firebrand to burn the White House down.  Who is most to be admired and emulated?  Builders or destroyers?

Finis of Thuvia, Maid Of Mars Review


Edgar Rice Burroughs On Mars

A Review

Thuvia, Maid Of Mars

Part III-B


R.E. Prindle

     ERB was born in 1875 before education had been affected by the ideologies of either the Communists or Dewey.  He was given a Classical versus scientific education in his critical Jr. High years.  Thus he must have known Latin reasonably well.

     The current High School system of the US came to fruition only during the twentieth century.  Universal literacy only became realizable a very short time ago.  Child labor didn’t disappear until after the Second World War.  Thus ERB really had a favored childhood.  ERB must have been familiar with memorization and drill; methods of education now highly discouraged.  Therefore his education was directed toward a full consciousness than sink into the inherently criminal unconscious which Communist method prevails today.  As there was no audio-visual culture at that time his was a print mentality through say 1910 when the movies began to have significance.  By 1920, at least, he was fully involved in a print-movie culture hence a more unconscious mode of thinking.  Still, his early training led him to a conscious approach to experiencing and analyzing.

     One can’t know for sure which year he became aware but it is safe to assume 1888-90.  Thus his immediate past extended back to about 1850 just as for me the twenties and thirties form my immediate past.  Yours can be computed as about twenty years before you were born.  As we grow up these years form the topic of discussion we overhear from our elders.

     ERB’s near past then can be calculated as about 1800 so that dying in 1950 as he did his life straddled, as it were, the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.  The nineteenth century was quite stunning in its diversity.  As a boy and young man ERB was alive at the time of ‘the winning of the West.’  His early life was lived in the high tide of ‘Western world supremacy.’  His heroes such as Teddy Roosevelt and Owen Wister epitomized the high tide.  The ‘Scramble For Africa’  of the last quarter of the nineteenth century formed the centerpiece of his literary corpus, that of Tarzan Of The Apes.  Also a key to his world outlook was the American Civil War that ended only ten years before he was born.  While I have found no direct evidence of the San Domingo Moment that occurred at the very beginning of the nineteenth century it is possible that he conflated San Domingo with the Civil War in the Martian series when the First Born, or Negroes, defeated the White Holy Therns nearly exterminating them.  Thus while ERB’s works are ‘pure entertainment’ if you look closely you’ll find some serious historical and social commentary.  If it weren’t there you wouldn’t have the Liberal Coalition condemning him as a bigot.  They do.

     For the purposes of this essay I will use a professor from Case-Western Reserve by the name of Richard Slotkin as a representative of the Liberal Coalition or Communist school.  In his essay Gunfighter Nation he lays the blame for everything he dislikes at the feet of Burroughs and two other writers- Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard.  We will get there soon enough but first lets consider the ‘humanitarian’ record of the Coalition.  In one form or another the Coalition and its constituents date back to the French Revolution and hence San Domingo.  Thus the Coalition was born in blood and murder.  Murder on a grand scale, genocide in fact.   The ideology of the Coalition is that of the Communists.  The men Slotkin so roundly condemns are all anti-Communists so the ideological differences are clear.

     Over the two centuries plus since the Revolution over a hundred million people have been murdered by units of the Coalition with hundreds of millions more projected for the near future.  Yet Mr. Slotkin proposes to represent our trio as indescribably evil because he attributes the My Lai Massacre in Viet Nam not to them personally but as a direct result of their writings.

     So there we have the basic issues.  The hypocrisy of Mr. Slotkin should be self-evident.

     What was the opinions of Messers Burroughts, Grant and Stoddard that so inflame Mr. Slotkin?

     Quite simply they are conscious, objective scholars as opposed to the unconscious method of Liberal writers.  Liberal views are products of the unconscious and cannot stand up to critical analysis.  The unconscious is selfish and criminal hence wishful.  The attitude is not what is but what I want.

     The high tide of Western world supremacy was ending as it was cresting.  This was noticeable to more acute intellects as early as 1900 and perhaps a decade earlier.  Burroughs hints at this when he describes the Lotharians as an ancient auburn haired White race who ruled a thalassocracy or a maritime empire.  Thus in his hierarchy of Martian races there was an earlier White race than the Therns.

     The Lotharians sailed forth to win Mars for the city at home much as European mariners won the world for Europe beginning with the Portuguese voyages of the fifteenth century,  Columbus and all the sea captains of the glorious age of discovery.  The seamen were only defeated by the stay-at-homes who sabotaged their efforts.

     Burroughs gives a valid interpretation of the age of European exploration and conquest from the fifteenth through nineteenth centuries.  Thus the story of the Lotharians, now shadows of their former selves, is a very poetic rendering of that history.

     The period ended with the 1899-1900 enunciation of the Open Door Policy in China by the American SecretaryOf State, John Hay.  China was in the process of being acquired by the European States at the time which the Open Door prevented thus guaranteeing China’s integrity.  This was a sea change in world politics.  the conquered peoples now began their counter offensive against the West.

      This change was noted by Burroughs, Grant and Stoddard.

      Madison Grant was of the earlier generation of TR while Burroughs and Stoddard were near contemporaries.  Burroughs born in 1875, Stoddard in 1883.  They both died in the same year, 1950.

     None of the three applauded the sea change but lamented it, running counter to Liberal ideology which applauded the change and latterly aroused the ire of Prof. Slotkin.  Thus he and his Coalition fellows demonize the three.

     They were only writers..  Until recently Grant and Stoddard had been all but forgotten.  Grant’s two best known works are The Passing Of The Great Race of 1915 and Conquest Of A Continent of 1933.  His main offence in the eyes of the coalition is that the Great Race is the Nordic race, which implies superiority, and his use of the term Nordic.  There was a tremendous effort at the time to ridicule and deny Nordics and Anglo-Saxons.  This is most notable in the vitriolic work of the bigot H.L. Mencken.  Nordic is a curse word within the Coalition.

     The Great Race is an interesting period piece but seems obsolete in its science.  Conquest is still usable as a guide for the Nordic migrations within the US.  I think it questionable that Burroughs was influenced by Grant who wrote after ERB had already committed himself although as Great Race made a splash it isn’t improbable that he read it.

     Lothrop Stoddard is a different story.  Here is a scholar done a great injury by the likes of Slotkin and the Coalition.  Stoddard wrote several books that might even be considered prophetic.  As noted he was eight years younger than ERB while graduating from Harvard.  Unlike Grant I think Slotkin is right that he was an influence on Burroughs but only after 1920 when Burroughs was fully formed.  It is possible that ERB accessed his research for his own purposes.

     Stoddard’s first book in 1914 was a terrific examination of the San Domingo Moment titled The French Revolution in San Domingo.  while the book was issued too late to affect ERB’s knowledge for use in Thuvia in 1914 events were transpiring that would have put Haiti, San Domingo’s later name, in his mind’s eye.  Beginning in January of 1914 several US warships landed troops in a very disorderly Haiti.  The bankers had precipitated yet another financial crisis by imprudent lending practices.  As was to become customary they called on the US government to bail them out.  In order to insure their loans the taxpayers were called upon to foot the bill.  The occupation of Haiti by the Marines began the next year and that lasted until well into the thirties before the troops were withdrawn.  Having gotten Haiti into trouble the bankers than looted the country for a couple decades.

     Another interesting sidelight in Haiti and the Caribbean was that 1914 was the year that McClurg’s released Tarzan Of The Apes.  Now, Ogden McClurg the ostensible owner of McClurg’s was only a figurehead.  The company had become employee owned after the last fire about 1900.  Ogden McClurg was living ERB’s fantasy life.  He was an officer in the Navy having spent the decade or so previous to 1914 as an operative in the Caribbean during a period when the US was famous for gunboat diplomacy among the Banana Republics.  It’s possible that he often worked undercover as a secret agent.

     ERB’s contact was Joe Bray who actually ran the day to day operations of the firm.  I’ve been told that McClurg had little to or no contact with the authors and indeed, it seems unlikely he could have being out of the country so much, yet ERB seems to have formed a jealous relationship with McClurg speaking of him as though he did know him.  That could only have been between 1914 and 1917.  Ogden was in Europe for three years or so during the war and after while ERB left for LA in 1919.  Deserves investigation.

     Back to Stoddard.  In 1920, 21 and 22 he issued his three most important books, the ones that so infuriate the volatile Liberal Coalition.  The titles were The Rising Tide Of Color Against White World Supremacy of 1920,  The New World Of Islam of 1921 and 1922’s The Revolt Against Civilization- The Menace Of The Underman.

     All three were prophetic and indeed, as of today, the prophecies have come to pass.  The first volume, The Rising Tide Of Color needs no explanation for the violent reaction of the Coalition.  By this time their agencies of the ADL, AJC and NAACP operating under the umbrella of the Communist Party were well able to defame anyone they chose with immunity from prosecution.

     The mere mention of White Supremacy was enough to make them foam at the mouth.  The reasons are clear and they were already formulated by the Revolution of 1792,  Now, we do have the problem of slavery which casts a pall over all discussions.  There is no justification for slavery although the institution still survives having now spread to America and Europe and it will flower everywhere once again before the century is half over.  So, really, the slavery issue is irrelevant.  ERB himself accepted the practice as a universal fact of life; the practice exists in all his stories.  

     Stoddard:  This analysis applies to the US of today as aptly as that of San Domingo in 1792.  “These men’ are the proto-Communist Jacobins of the French Revolution:

     “If you (the San Domingan Whites) are sufficiently united to follow my counsel, I guarantee the salvation of San Domingo.  But, in any case, let no one cherish the hope of mercy from these men, let no one be deluded by their sly tricks of policy; the negroes alone find room in their affections, and all the whites without distinction, all the mulattoes as well, are doomed; all whites are dangerous to their projects, all alike will be sacrificed as soon as these men shall have disposed of the officers, gotten rid of the troops of the line, and become at last the undisputed masters.”

      As San Domingo in 1792, so Euroamerica in 2010.  We were promised change but none has or will ocuur.  Two hundred years later same words, same tune.  So, Slotkin would have us believe that decent self-respecing scholars and writers such as Burroughs, Grant and Stoddard were responsible for My Lai rather than Robespierre,Danton and Murat.  Well, you can fool some of the people all the time….

     Just as his first of this trio of books prophesied the coming race wars, so Stoddard’s World Of Islam prophesied the current invasion of Euroamerica and the religious wars, for that is what ‘terrorism’ is.  The third book The Revolt Against Civilization has also come to pass as the asault on Western culture, which is to say, civilization continues on an accelerated pace.

     It was this book that had the greatest influence on ERB that would surface in 1934s Tarzan And The Lion Man.  Stoddard is much influenced by the evolutionary theory of Auguste Weis.  Especially the notion of body and germ cells that ERB embraced so enthusiastically  in 1934.  ERB’s interpretation was certainly pure entertainment but based on current scientific knowledge nonetheless.

     As for ERB’s notions he was expressing developed opinions on the social scene under cover of entertainment long before he could have been influenced by either Grant or Stoddard so Richard Slotkin is quite wrong in his prejudicial interpretation of ERB as in ignorant spouter of bigotry based on the other two.

     In fact Slotkin ignores the content of all three men to denounce them as ignorant, uninformed bigots who were nevertheless taken so seriously by gunslinging Americans that by Slotkins own words they caused the My Lai Massacre.   But enough of Slotkin who sabotages his own thesis by confessing to inadequate research.  A much more interesting topic is The Revolt Against Civilization of which it can truly be said that revoltagainst civilization applies to ERB as well as his arch enemies- the Liberal Coalition.

Part III-C will involve civilization and its malcontents.